User talk:Shankargb

License tagging for File:Secretary Dept. of Defence RD and director-general of DRDO Dr. S Christopher receiving the National Award from Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Secretary Dept. of Defence RD and director-general of DRDO Dr. S Christopher receiving the National Award from Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Secretary Dept. of Defence RD and Chairman of DRDO Dr. S Christopher receiving the National Award from Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Secretary Dept. of Defence RD and Chairman of DRDO Dr. S Christopher receiving the National Award from Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Hamtechperson. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Wire (Indian web publication), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ham tech person 22:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! SerChevalerie (talk) 05:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm SerChevalerie. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on 2020 Bangalore riots, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! SerChevalerie (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Swarajya (magazine), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For further clarification, see WP:lead which says "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents." (emphasis mine). As a summary, repeating what is in the article body is perfectly normal. Whether the content you removed is significant enough for the lead and sufficiently summarised I make no comment, but "repetitive sentences" is clearly not a valid reason for removing something from the lead unless the repetition is happening in the lead itself. Nil Einne (talk) 06:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Agnivesh, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Epic Barnstar

		The Epic Barnstar
		Thank you for being neutral. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Project notifications

Please see my comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Need some input concerning project notifications. Otr500 (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jyotirao Phule. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 03:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely constructive. The lead wasn't written with MOS:LEAD but drive-by POV pushing infected it. You are free to add sources that completely support the disputed content per WP:VERIFY. But don't use MOS:LEAD to justify POV pushing on lead. Shankargb (talk) 13:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Are the DS alerts in one area not valid for another area? You gave one to this editor in August 2020 and giving a second one under a year from the last.. Why? Vikram Vincent 05:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the above two templates concern DS alerts of the two different conflicting areas than the one about which Doug Weller alerted 6 months ago. Shankargb (talk) 05:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like Vincenvikram knows they are in different areas already. In answer to Vincentvikram question, yes, DS alerts are only valid for the area they are given in. See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#aware.aware. The requirement is that people are aware that discretionary sanctions are in place for the specific area covered, not just in general. Being aware that there are discretionary sanctions for electronic cigarettes obviously doesn't mean you are aware they are also discretionary sanctions for the Shakespeare authorship question. Nil Einne (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Journey to the West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tianzhu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Placenames

Please stop changing the names of places in our articles, to different names to those used as our article titles, as you did at Faizabad district. We use the Common names in English for our articles, not the "Official names", so changing the name breaks internal links to those articles, and is confusing to our readers - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The common name does not exist any more. I am not sure whether you visited Ayodhya recently. All the buses display the name as Ayodhya, Railway stations are known as Ayodhya and Ayodhya Cantt and the Airport shows the name Ayodhya International Airport. Only the wokes, libbies, lefties and anti-nationals are in denial mode even after the name change 5 years back. Shankargb (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, "Ayodhya district" is so uncommon in reliable sources (as opposed to your anecdotal evidence] that Google Ngrams doesn't even recognise it. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faizabad district, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one vandalizing, not allowing the users to make the genuine corrections. I may be forced to lodge a complaint against you. Shankargb (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]