User talk:Siggfried

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Japanese people in Belgium is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you!!!!=) Siggfried (talk) 10:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shigeomi Hasumi moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Shigeomi Hasumi, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333 TBH I thought 7 sources were enough for this deceased Mainichi Film Award for Best Music nominee and winner to qualify for GNG. Notice that the subject also has an article at Japanese Wikipedia. In fact I translated this article from that one. I added seven more sources and submitted the draft for review. Siggfried (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Siggfried! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —Alalch E. 23:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Alalch E., thank you so much for the message and for the cookies!! Siggfried (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shigeomi Hasumi has been accepted

Shigeomi Hasumi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nocturnal781 (talk) 03:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You did a great job with Arabs in Belgium! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BoyTheKingCanDance, thank you so much! =D I'm glad my work is appreciated =) Siggfried (talk) 10:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Japanese Tower of Brussels is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow wow wow, thank you! :D Siggfried (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written translations

Your translation for Sato Tomomi is very poorly written. Please refrain from creating additional translations before learning the structure of English sentences, grammar, etc. ImperialMajority (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ImperialMajority I thought it was acceptable and I am still editing now. If you have any advice or tweaks can't you help edit it? Siggfried (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I could assist you with fixing the multiple grammatical errors evident in the article; however, I also instructed you to refrain from creating additional translations. ImperialMajority (talk) 21:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if you want to help you are welcome.

When did you instruct me? Siggfried (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Within the body of this topic. ImperialMajority (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Wow. Kazuya Kosaka is another excellent page. You're making a great contribution! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!!! =)=D Siggfried (talk) 10:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Naziha Mestaoui.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naziha Mestaoui.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Siggfried persistently adding unsourced population figures to Arabs in Belgium. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siggfried, this discussion has gone on all day and I see no one supporting your argument and defense. You are truly digging yourself in a hole when you start making personal attacks against other editors. Try to hear what message other editors are trying to tell you about Wikipedia policies and back away before you find yourself blocked. It's you, a new editor, arguing about policy with very experienced editors, I think you should stop taking this personally and walk away with their reminders about V in mind. This is a no-win dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz (talk • contribs) 01:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz There is a lot of misunderstanding on that admin section. I don't claim and never claimed that WP:V isn't paramount, or that I can publish stuff without sources. Quite the opposite of that: just look at my translations and compare them with the original articles. Larry had already pointed out there were some few unsourced stuff at Arabs in Belgium, and I acknowledged that I had forgotten to paste the source from wp:nl, and that I didn't check, even apologizing. Further, on the same admin section I declared I would follow WP:V (which they suggest me to do) even though I was already doing it and never stopped. My problem, what I am arguing about there, is another. First, Larry shouldn't have resorted to the admins so quickly; and second, I earnestly believe the approach of Larry and the other user is not advisable for that or any article. Why deleting stuff without giving other editors (especially the op) a chance to provide sources? And as an example of this: Larry had already removed a bunch of stuff from the article Arabs in Belgium, I had it in my watchlist fortunately, and was able to restore the content and quickly provided sources for it. It was easy, because the (quite plausible) content I translated was based on reliable sources. But suppose I hadn't had that page on my watchlist... that content would be now lost, even though it was verifiable, and quite easily so as well. Siggfried (talk) 08:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arabs in Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Voix du Nord. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Administrative note // Timothy :: talk 10:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arabs in Belgium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arabs in Belgium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabs in Belgium (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Black Kite (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]