User talk:Skippy8888

Speedy deletion of Briglin

A tag has been placed on Briglin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 22:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Briglin

I have nominated Briglin, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briglin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Briglin

Hi Skippy,

I've made a few change to the Briglin article which will hopefully improve its chances of survival. The two most important things for an article are that it must be WP:Notable and WP:Verifiable. The article needs to say why the subject is important (not just that it exists or existed) and it must provide reputable sources supporting any claims in the article (especially claims relating to notability. If you know of any more published references about Briglin Pottery, please add them to the article.

Also, when you leave a comment, you should sign it with ~~~~, like this: Pburka (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference: Briglin.com

Hi, this is still confusing as hell. I think this article is locked and I need to kindly request admin to add a link to www.briglin.com = References section as with studio pottery link. Skippy8888 (talk) 18:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC) User:Skippy8888 2nd May 2011[reply]