User talk:Skratata69
Hello, Skratata69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 12:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the fruit? Do you automate this welcome? Skratata69 (talk) 19:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
Talk pages are confusing[edit]
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Why are talk pages so confusing, with no separation of comments or UI? They just seem to be a massive page anyone can edit, while it should have been some forum Skratata69 (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Talk pages are divided into sections and each section can be individually edited. Talk page conventions say that each successive comment in a section should generally be indented by one more level than the one before it.
- Does this help? Are you looking at the desktop view or the mobile view? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 19:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah why "generally"? Why does the software not provide a forum like interface, and leave it up to the user to maintain all this? Skratata69 (talk) 19:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you have the time, can you please answer the following too:
- How you divided them into sections?
- How you marked the help request as answered?
- Who marked it as a help request? Skratata69 (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, trying again. I thought I answered this before but it seems to have been lost (perhaps I never posted it).
- I use the source editor. To create a new section, I type a line like == Section header == and you can use more equal signs for sub- and sub-sub sections. I'm not so good at explaining how to do it with the visual editor, but there certainly is a way.
- Also, from the view in the source editor, you can see that a help request is made by using one of the {{help me}} templates. I marked it as answered by changing it to {{help me-helped}}.
- As for my use of "generally", many editors do not add a layer of indent if they are answering the prior question, adding on to the existing response.
- The Wikipedia software is quite old and slow to change. Often, when a new feature is introduced, a lot of editors complain about the change. There exist sites that copy Wikipedia's content - which they are allowed to do because of Wikipedia's license - and reformat or re-present the content to make it more "modern". Wikiwand is an example. There are places to make suggestions about how the software can be improved. The most recent that I found is m:Community Wishlist Survey 2023. You can also engage in discussions at WP:Village pump (proposals) and similar forums. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 00:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Skratata69 (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NIFTY 50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial Express. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NIFTY Next 50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- BSE SENSEX
- added a link pointing to Financial Express
- NIFTY 50
- added a link pointing to Financial Express
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)