User talk:SmallpoxSmasher23

As a wikipedia "editor" I personally believe that this is unconstructive for no reason. Henceforth I am undoing it. SmallpoxSmasher23 (talk) 16:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In simple terms, fuck off SmallpoxSmasher23 (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SmallpoxSmasher23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Edits are constructive as I am reverting bad edits.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppet of multiple blocked vandals. Yamla (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

With all due respect, no, not really. You undid my restoration of content without good reason. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 16:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]