User talk:Solvaram

Speedy deletion nomination of Eight-Constitution Medicine

Hello Solvaram,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eight-Constitution Medicine for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eight-Constitution Medicine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eight-Constitution Medicine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 13:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eight-Constitution Medicine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eight-Constitution Medicine, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://ecmed.org/board/content.asp?bsNo=17. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Eight-Constitution Medicine, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Your article is promotional and uses content that has been copied and pasted. Stop recreating it. Home Lander (talk) 15:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Solvaram. You have new messages at Home Lander's talk page.
Message added 15:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Home Lander (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Traditional Korean medicine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Solvaram

User:Solvaram, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Solvaram and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Solvaram during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61:I saw your writing well. Please tell me how to introduce Korea 's 8 Constitution medicine. that's why i would introduce. And does the subsequent deletion mean I can not even write to the user page that I can write? Should I leave Wikipedia? Is this the policy of Wikipedia?--Solvaram (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe this topic merits inclusion in Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Also, since this topic appears to be of a medical nature, you'll need to review Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable medical sources. This particular field appears to be the invention and pursuit of a single doctor, not a broadly practice field or subfield of chiropractic. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per U5.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berean HunterYou want to be faithful to your work. But that is not universal value. What I wanted the first time was a brief factuality. People just do not know it. Thank you. --Solvaram (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For now, the material in your sandbox has been left and not deleted. What was deleted was your userpage. If you can find proper reliable sources to cite your work then you may continue to work on it within your sandbox.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 04:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berean Hunter Doctors are not doing what they have to do. They have to discriminate people personally and make customized prescriptions. People do not ask. They do not know which drugs and foods are good for what constitution. Most people want to think that their appetite is right. But it is not. What they eat to call illness is to inform them of the error. Adam and Eve were also.

Future Wikipedia will need to be prepared to record information about the nature of the person in relation to this issue. Constitution is as important as their first and last name. It is because the constitution reveals the identity of the person rather than the name and the career. Therefore, constitution will be essential information for the future of Wikipedia.--Solvaram (talk) 05:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not this "Eight-Constitution Medicine" proves to be a real thing or not, Wikipedia is not, under any circumstances, a vehicle to provide medical advice or diagnostic tools. If you feel the need to promulgate this information, buy a website and publish it, but do not use Wikipedia for such purposes. (See Wikipedia:General disclaimer.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDan61 It is right for your current thinking. But it is the sound you do not know the constitution. Later you will know that knowing the constitution is the most important information for a person. Now you will never know.--Solvaram (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I will know, if you find the proper venue to publish your work. It's just not here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other WikiLeaker told me that this topic could be used by someone else if needed. This is the right answer. You are wrong in saying that the subject of constitution does not fit the wiki. It is obvious. I am also a user of Wikipedia, and the subject of constitution is also a topic that can be accepted at some time on the wiki. It is foolish to deny this.--Solvaram (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The cultural personality of mankind comes from constitution. What you eat and what you avoid is what comes out of the constitution, and whether you get sick or healthy starts with a constitutional regimen. You should not assume that you know what you do not know. It is not too late to talk after learning more. Irritation comes from your constitution.--Solvaram (talk) 13:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion on 'Wikipedia Discussion: WikiMedia 2030' proposed in Korean Wikipedia

I dream of Wikipedia to classify the constitution and personality of the whole human race. English Wikipedia is the current structure that can not accept this theme at all. However, if the seed is taken off the ground, it will sprout. English Wikipedia currently has a pathologically sensitive rejection of the word 8 constitutional medicine(Eight-Constitution Medicine). Of course, this is my problem, and the rigidity of English wiki users seems to cause problems.--Solvaram (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Solvaram/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Solvaram/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 14:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Solvaram! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 14:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:RHaworth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

: I won't mind your threats, but I just want to communicate my interest in constitution to the world.
 There seems to be confusion because communication is not smooth due to cultural and linguistic differences. What I want is for people to be able to maintain health and discriminatory regimens that fit their constitution. I think Wikipedia can also contribute to this point. If this intention has bothered you, please understand. Again, I will not worry about editing Wikipedia as there is no time to waste in the workshop. However, it is good to have a heart that respects the content and intentions the other person is trying to say. We hope that your role will continue to work and reward you. May differential health be with you.Solvaram (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]