User talk:Sonamnegi121

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arunpawargere per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arunpawargere. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sonamnegi121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have only done the edits which were required. If I did edits, which were looking as promotion then I was required to get blocked from Wikipedia. The user, Casualdejekyll , never goes through the references (As checked from the history of People News Chronicle) and remove (Content that has a solid reference from independent sources), revert changes made by new users on the page. I have also seen User: Arunpawargere history, and through his history only I tried to make changes to the pages on which he messed up the things, But I never did or tried to harm any of the articles. I always tried to provide more information, only after researching about the topic and look for independent sources from google. The block that I received, is only because I supported a user on Afd, and I supported only because the user had explained and provided the references from independent sources. I never tried or will never try to make such changes which are against Wikipedia community and guidelines. I request admin to review the edits I did and then remove this block if I haven’t done anything against the community and guidelines. Sonamnegi121 (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Simransertt. This will count against you in future unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 21:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block has got nothing to do with Casualdejekyll, it is all about what you have done. You were blocked last year under the account Simransertt. Since then, you have made multiple new accounts to evade your block. That is why you are blocked again; the only way you can edit here legitimately is to make a successful appeal at your original account. Every new account you create will be blocked as soon as it is discovered. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who says I’m Simransertt? Have you checked the IP address if not, then kindly get it checked as I mentioned earlier I only went through their profile and from their I made changes to the articles on which the banned user did. I only tried to remove the changes from my account. Sonamnegi121 (talk) 15:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Girth Summit, but Girth Summit is a CheckUser, which is a permission which allows them to do exactly that (check the IP address). Which is.. exactly what they did. You're not going to get unblocked based on arguing you're not Simransertt, because you are Simransertt. You might get unblocked with an appeal on the Simransertt account. casualdejekyll 18:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of the changes I did is to make articles consist of verified information. I don’t have any connection with simran or arunpawargere. It might seem only because through their contributions only, I get leads to the pages they have done changes on. So I request kindly not add my name with the blocked users.Sonamnegi121 (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need multiple unblock requests open - the one above is sufficient, whoever reviews it will read through this.

To answer your question: yes, I checked the IP addresses each account had used. Whoever reviews your request will do the same, and see what I saw. If I have made a mistake, they will notice and unblock you. I'm pretty sure I didn't make a mistake however, the results I saw were unambiguous. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s see, as I know who I am. So waiting to get unlocked and show you. Sonamnegi121 (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]