Jump to content

User talk:Sonic3KMaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Sonic3KMaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! The first thing you should know is that we encourage you to be bold. Feel free to edit and improve articles, by clicking any 'edit' link.

If you'd like to test what Wikipedia can do, check out the sandbox - just type and save the page and your text will appear. That's the beauty of a Wiki.

For more information check out our tutorial - it's designed with newcomers in mind, as is the help section. If you'd like to get involved with current projects, have a look at the Community Portal. There are always tasks for users to do, ranging from copyediting to expanding stubs.

I hope you'll enjoy your time here, but be warned, it can become addictive! Feel free to message me, I'm more than happy to help. As an added tip, sign any message you post so users know that you've said it. To do so is delightfully simple, just use the wikicode ~~~~.

Once again, welcome! James Kendall [talk] 16:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Petition

[edit]

Hi, I was just wondering if you would like to sign this petition. It's a petition for getting the original voice actors back for the Sonic games (instead of the Sonic X voice actors). --anon

Thanks for signing it! --anon

Xbox 360 display modes

[edit]

You added the comment "All Xbox 360 are in 720i, 720p or 1080i" to the Comparison of seventh-generation game consoles article, but it doesn't make sense. Were you trying to say that XB360 only outputs 720i/p and 1080i? If so, you must be mistaken, because the console also outputs 480i (standard resolution), and more than likely 480p (progressive-scan). --ZeromaruTC 17:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Articles

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia:Good articles was recently changed; articles must be nominated first. Only once another user endorses the nomination may it be added as a GA. Also, it helps if objections to the article's first run on GA are fixed before re-nominating it. Thanks. Nifboy 19:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feces image removal

[edit]

DOn't do it. 72.152.176.7 11:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Earth-hours?

[edit]

What is an Earth-hour? Are there other types of hours? How are they different from Earth-hours? — Knowledge Seeker 07:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Earth, there are 24 hours in a day. Well, the sentence "Jupiter also has the fastest rotation rate of any planet within the solar system, making a complete rotation on its axis in slightly less than ten hours" could be interpretted that hours are split up into one tenth of a rotation on Jupiter. At least, that was my rationale behind making the change. If you think the original wording is better, I won't argue or anything. Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 19:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't really make sense to me. One tenth of a rotation of Jupiter is approximately an hour. Or are you worried that readers might think that an hour is defined as "slightly more than one tenth of the time it takes Jupiter to make one complete rotation" instead of "one twenty-fourth of the time it takes Earth to make one complete rotation"? And if so, wouldn't that be a problem any time one used hours as a unit of time? Since there don't seem to be any other types of hours, and since the term "Earth-hour" doesn't seem to be used anywhere else, I removed it for now. Feel free to discuss this further if you disagree. I appreciate the response! — Knowledge Seeker 09:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just read the defination of hour, and it's based on the Earth, so it wouldn't make any sense to say Earth hour. Sorry for any confusion I've caused. By the way, having your text as a different color is cool. Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 18:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmph, well, it reflects my ego and self-importance, insisting on using a special color for my own messages. Actually, I think it helps in both leaving messages on a user's own talk page while also keeping conversations intact. I got the idea from User:GordonWatts. Glad you like it! Don't apologize; I'm glad you brought up the point, and I'm going to try to see if I can think of a way to better clarify that in the article. — Knowledge Seeker 08:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How do you change the signature, anyway? INVERTED 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State Route 524 (Washington)

[edit]

I have no problem with you putting the map images back on the SR 524 Spur page. But just to let you know, I did leave it out on purpose, as it was essentially useless (nothing more than a red dot), and I wasn't clear on whether it was for the Lynnwood or the Edmonds spur. -- NORTH talk 03:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic The Hedgehog

[edit]

I know there was no conseus on the talk page, but I know for a FACT that the characters name is "Sonic The Hedgehog". TJ Spyke 02:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something interesting of note is that the instruction manual for Sonic Riders has Sonic's name spelled "Sonic The Hedgehog" in the Characters section, while the other characters' names are spelled "Jet the Hawk", "Wave the Swallow", "Knuckles the Echidna", and "Storm the Albatross". Whether this is a typographical error or not is beyond me. It's not the same for Sonic Heroes, though--Sonic's name in that manual is spelled "Sonic the Hedgehog", but Sonic Heroes hasn't come out as recently. --Brandon Dilbeck 02:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Funny, I know for sure it's Sonic the hedgehog because that's what Sonic 1's, Sonic 2's, Sonic 3's, Sonic & Knuckle's and Sonic Heroes' manuels say (I can't find the adventure or advance manuels...). I've uploaded a scan of Sonic Heroes' manuel since it's the most recent one I own to ImageShack here. Brandon Dilbeck says that it's The in Sonic Riders, but that game isn't as canon, although it does make me waiver my opinion a bit. I can't find anything on the Sonic/Sega website without everything in all caps, unfortunately. Finally, since the name of the article is Sonic the Hedgehog, it seems fitting that he's called Sonic the Hedgehog in the article. Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 03:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I remember the instruction manuals had is "The", Sega also registered that as Sonics middle name meaning it should be capitalized. TJ Spyke 03:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Umm, how do you know that? Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 03:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is as close as I can find to a legal name for Sonic: here. Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 03:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That link does not work. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 23:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure I've seen his name abbreviated as "Sonic T. Hedgehog" at least once, although I can't remember where. This kind of abbreviation is usually only perfomed for middle names. (Stefan2 06:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Hmm, you're right. Although, I can't specifically remember where I saw it, I do recall seeing the "The" abbreviated "T.". I'll look into it tomorrow. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 06:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit to Sonic 3: rv - too detailed (To user Steerpike)

[edit]
You revereted the information, saying it is too detailed, yet the Sonic 1 article has small section for each zone. What's wrong with expaining knuckle's appearances and the transitions between levels? Sonic3KMaster(talk) 20:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC) I pose the same questions for your edits to Sonic & Knuckles. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 20:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What's with the color? You shouldn't really use them in ordinary text on wikis, even on talk pages. Anyway, I agree with Steerpike. Your edits weren't really of any use, it is enough to state that the game features cutscenes and act transitions, rather than explaining every single one. By the way, I noticed this is on your talk page. If you want Steerpike to read this, you should put it on his. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 23:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, the Sonic the Hedgehog 1 entry is also too detailed. I was working on an overhaul for that page but have put it on hold for a while. I don't mean to be pedantic but a lot of people get carried away with these video game articles. You should always keep in mind that Wikipedia is read by a wide variety of people, not just game fans. The casual reader is probably interested in the gameplay, the storyline or the production of the game first. Nobody really cares whether Eggman turns blue in Flying Battery, or Knuckles uses a lever to blow Sonic over Mushroom Hill. I think level descriptions should be short and to the point. Level transitions are really of minor interest here.
There are a ton of websites on the internet to give that sort of info. This is after all an encyclopedia, not a walkthrough. However, seeing as I've been involved in an edit war or two lately, I've been planning to give up on these pages entirely in the near future. Frankly I'm fed up with babysitting on them. No offense to you. --Steerpike 23:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind then, I agree that the Sonic 1 zone's section is too long. I thought that length was the goal of other Sonic articles, so I added some stuff. Good point, there are a better places to get the zone specific information, like GameFAQs :P. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 23:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
I know the link doesn't work, I'm still trying to figure a way to link directly to the information, until then one will have to search the trademark database for whatever Sonic's name. Regurading you're comment about my edits to Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles, I've already talked with Steerpike about it. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 23:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Different topics belong in a different section. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 23:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you placed an Original Research tag on this article. As you may know, I placed the OR tag earlier today, and the article's creator removed it. I have since listed it for AfD, which you may want to vote in. My guess is that the OR tag will be removed again, so you may want to watch it. ---Charles 02:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info, it's always nice to see people use the talk page for both positive and negative purposes. I'll vote to delete it. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 03:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3dwa

[edit]

Hi. Why are you changing the links? Are the redirects working improperly? There is nothing bad about linking to a redirect and we should get in the habit of fixing them only if it doesn't get you to where it's supposed to go. --Polaron | Talk 16:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't like redirects (I know that changing them goes to redirects now, but they won't in the future, hopefully). They all worked properly, I just want to encourage people to move pages to the new namespaces I guess. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 16:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Either way is fine with me. Just be aware that there is a reason those redirects exist, and that, as Polaron says, there's nothing wrong with linking to a redirect. For example, if we were to spell out State Route in those templates, we could use the pipe trick and type only [[State Route 702 (Washington)|]] to create a link reading State Route 702 that would point correctly to the page via a redirect. However, since we're piping to an abbreviation anyway, the pipe trick doesn't work here, so it doesn't really matter what's before.
I would probably have to advise you against making such changes in the future, however. -- NORTH talk 18:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You

[edit]

You joined Wikipedia on Valentines Day. But why wasn't your first edit contributing to a topic about love or Valentines Day? -24.92.41.95 01:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm heartless and don't observe St. Valentine's Day jk, I guess I didn't even think about it. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 06:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be a dick but..

[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Dylan Lake 00:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I only use Edit summaries when I feel the edit needs to be explained, usually not minor edits like fixing grammar, links, or ppl using [[http://google.com]] vs. [http://google.com]. Thanks for the input, though, I'll try to use edit summaries more often. (If you look at my contributions, you'll see i usually make minor edits, the kind I feel don't need to be explained, maybe I got into a bad habit of omitting them...) Sonic3KMaster(talk) 00:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, you did come off sounding like a dick, I know what and edit summary is :P Sonic3KMaster(talk) 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha sorry, you do your thing. Just bugs me sometimes when I can't tell the difference between the 2 edits... Nice to meet you. --Dylan Lake 00:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used the 71.231.150.79 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC) because that's how Quinn signed his entry! Go Quinn![reply]

lol, whatever Sonic3KMaster(talk) 03:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Aww. That's too bad. Thanks for notifying me though. --Anthony5429 06:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I'm going to stick with the image list on my user page for now. Thanks for the Rubik's cube UBX. I solve it in 1:07 - you? --Anthony5429 17:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
45 seconds, when I practiced all the time. I don't solve as often anymore, but I think I'm around a minute still. Sonic3KMaster(talk) 19:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SonicJump.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SonicJump.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:USRD Newsletter Issue 1

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 1 10 February 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project News Notability of state highways is challenged
Important deletion debates
Featured subproject
Featured member
From the editor
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/N
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  V60 VTalk · VDemolitions 20:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 2

[edit]
File:New Jersey blank.svg

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 2 24 February 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project News Notability of state highways is upheld
Deletion debates Kansas Turnpike is now a Good Article
Featured subproject U.S. Roads IRC channel created
Featured member Infoboxes and Navigation subproject started
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 3 10 March 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project news Inactivity?
Deletion debates Article Improvement Drive
Featured subproject Good and Featured Articles
Featured member
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Active user verification

[edit]

Hello, Sonic3KMaster. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 4

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 4 24 March 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project news March 16 IRC Meeting
Deletion debates Kentucky and Utah projects demoted
Featured subproject A quick look at the structural integrity of state highway WikiProjects
Featured member
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 5

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 5 5-8 April 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project news Good and Featured Articles are promoted
Deletion debates Interstate 238 revert war
Featured subproject IRC discussion comes to light
Featured member
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Apologies for the late delivery, TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WA-524_Spur.png listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WA-524_Spur.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 18:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 6

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 6 21 April 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features:
Project news Canada highway WikiProjects deleted
Deletion debates
Featured member
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot 22:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 7

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 7 5 May 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates
Project news April 27 IRC meeting California
Deletion debates MacArthur Maze Fire Illinois
Featured member Circular route shields Pennsylvania
From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.VshBot (tc) 19:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 8

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 8 19 May 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates
Project news USRD members assist Canada project California
Deletion debates Two debates at USRD Illinois
Featured member A new GA Oklahoma
From the editors Pennsylvania
From the editors Washington
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.VshBot (tc) 19:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 9

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 9 9 June 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates
Project news Highways notability guideline? California
Deletion debates Portal debate Maryland
Featured member Three new GAs
From the editors Exit list debates
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.VshBot (tc) 16:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:One Piece episode 289.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:One Piece episode 289.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 10

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 10 7 July 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates
Project news Kentucky subproject promoted California
Deletion debates AID restructuring Maryland
Featured member GA status Pennsylvania
From the editors Notability discussion currently collecting dust
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.VshBot (tc) 04:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An important letter

[edit]

Dear roads editor,

You may have noticed some changes at WP:USRD lately. Some of them, like the cleanup templates and the stub templates, have been astounding and great. Unfortunately, others have been disturbing.

This has become evidenced by the departure of a few prominent editors at USRD, a few RFC's, and much fighting among USRD editors.

After the second RFC, many of us found the opportunity to take a step away from Wikipedia for a while--as a self-imposed wikibreak, or possibly on vacation.

The result of such introspection was that many of us were placing ourselves in a "walled garden" and on a self-imposed pedestal of authority over the roads department. Also, we were being hostile to a few users who were not agreeing with us.

In fact, IRC has been the main incarnation of this "walled garden." Decisions have been made there to conduct grudges and prejudices against a few valued USRD users with poor justification.

For this, we have come to apologize. We have come to ask your forgiveness.

In addition to this, we hope to work as one USRD team from now on and to encourage cooperation instead of the promotion of interests.

All users are welcome to collaborate on IRC, the newsletter, or anywhere else at USRD.

In the future, please feel free to approach us about any issues you may have.

Regards,

Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 17:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 11

[edit]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 11 18 August 2007 About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State and national updates
Project news Cleanup system revamped Assessment
Deletion debates Stubs renamed New York
Featured member IRC channel goes global
From the editors Minnesota bridge collapses
One year after SRNC: A reflection
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot 22:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 12

[edit]
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 12 • September 1, 2007About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot 22:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:XPIMEpad.PNG)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:XPIMEpad.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BearShare.png

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BearShare.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 13

[edit]
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 13 • September 15, 2007About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot 19:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Inactivity check and news report

[edit]

Hello, Sonic3KMaster. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

  1. Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
  2. There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 14

[edit]
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 14 • September 30, 2007About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.O bot (tc) 01:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD inactivity notification

[edit]

You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oreo O's.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Oreo O's.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Segagt2002.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Segagt2002.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphim Whipp 02:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

[edit]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 01:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

[edit]

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 13:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talkcontribs)

WP:WASH activity check

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians! This is a message from the Washington State Highways project. You are being contacted as you are listed as a member of the WikiProject. We are conducting an activity check, and if you do not add "Aye" in the Dec 10 Check field of the participants list, you will be removed from the project participants list. Should you wish to leave the project, simply delete your user name from the list.

Thanks!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Washington State Highways at 17:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WP:WASH activity check - last call

[edit]

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Washington State Highways at 04:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

kitty.

Sonic3KMaster(talk) 15:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi S3&K

[edit]

Hi I'm Tailsman67 from the SNN.:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

[edit]
Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Imzadi 1979  22:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MugRootBeer.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MugRootBeer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Sonic3KMaster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sonic3KMaster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sonic3KMaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Super Emerald has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 29 § Super Emerald until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 00:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]