User talk:Spa-to-afd-Tseng Kwong Chi

I reverted your incomplete afd of Tseng Kwong Chi your user name seems to infer that you are not acting in good faith. Theroadislong (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Am IP user cannot create an AfD; I am trying to do so but having problems because of my poor quality internet connection; please respect that and allow me to at least attempt the nomination - the rationale is "not [[WP:|GNG]]".

If you can help me nominate it, that'd be great.

But please don't misuse "revert". Thanks. Spa-to-afd-Tseng Kwong Chi (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

As you are no doubt aware, if an editor removes comments from their talk page, you do not get to editwar them back. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if the editor does. But not you. 88.104.31.21 (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Spa-to-afd-Tseng_Kwong_Chi reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: ). Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and editing logged out to avoid scrutiny and continue the edit war, as you did at Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]