User talk:Springchickensoup

Recent edits

Hi Springchickensoup. I've undone a couple of your recent edits to a few talkpages where you removed the code for an archiving bot. The thing is that when you removed the code you also removed the links to the actual archived posts. You might want to double-check some of your latest edits to talkpages.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Hi Springchickensoup

Please will you stop adding non-existent eponymous categories to articles?

Some of the more recent additions include:

Category:Whistlefield, which you added[1] to Whistlefield. That's a tiny hamlet, sp it is very unlikely that Wikipedia will ever have enough articles to populate a category for this hamlet.
Category:Loch Striven, which you added[2] to Loch Striven. There is no precedent for categorising the local villages by sea loch, so if the category was actually created, it would probably be deleted.

There have been many more, but I didn't make a note of them at the time.

Categories exist to facilitate navigation between articles (see WP:CAT). Adding non-existent categories, or categories which would only ever contain one article, does nothing to help readers navigate between articles.

What happens when you do this is that the categories get listed in Special:WantedCategories, where other editors find them and then have to take time assessing why they were added, before removing them. That's not helpful.

I also notice that neither of the edits linked above had an edit summary which accurately described what was done:

This edit[3] to Whistlefield has an edit summary "infobox edit". That is untrue. The edit dis not change the infobox at all> It added a category, and the edit summary doesn't mention that.
This edit[4] to Loch Striven also doesn't mention adding a category.

Thanks. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI February 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Springchickensoup, thanks for making articles on all these places! I've made some changes and added more sources at Coylet and removed the "unreviewed article" header, but I couldn't see a reason to include tourist info like the caravan park, and I'm afraid it just isn't long enough for so many pictures. Did anybody give you the welcome template or suggest you ask questions at the Teahouse? Yngvadottir (talk) 20:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning from the community

As an uninvolved administrator, I am closing the ANI discussion against you with the following result:

You have been repeatedly in engaged in disruptive editing in the ways set out in this discussion.
You are warned that any further disruption, including may lead to a block without further warning.

Thanks, --Neutrality^talk 22:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Gantocks) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Gantocks, Springchickensoup!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add relevant wikiprojects to talk pages of articles you create.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Springchickensoup. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Springchickensoup! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 00:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]