User talk:SuperHypercane

SuperHypercane, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi SuperHypercane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kidz Bop 20 because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zirconian

The article Zirconian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this term has been used or proposed in scientific literature

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 12:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zirconian

The article Zirconian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No support for the term "Zirconian" provided in references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the source did not mention nibiru

That's the key. Serendi ^pod ous 05:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll get on that does! --SuperHypercane (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, but remember, it must pass WP:RS criteria. Serendi ^pod ous 19:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Skarsvåg

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to Skarsvåg. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you! Hey, don't do this anymore, OK? Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 01:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nov. 10, 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Google+. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

Nov. 22, 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Google+, you may be blocked from editing.

WP:NOR

Please stop inserting original research[1] and unverified trivia (see Vikingen island, Polar night, Mount Thor, Lazarus syndrome) to Wikipedia articles. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Omnipaedista (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just trying to help wikipedia. SuperHypercane (talk) 23:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I should look at the rules because wikipedia is pretty tricky, yeah, I putted trivial facts in the wrong place. SuperHypercane (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Google+, you may be blocked from editing. You have been editing the G+ article for months, changing minor things while adding your personal opinion in the edit summary. I recommend you stop. GSK ✉ ✓ 08:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. SuperHypercane (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Here you added trivial information that was already in the article. --Omnipaedista (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm normally an unaccepted, revertworthy user on Wikipedia. SuperHypercane (talk) 10:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is called Gaskiers glaciation, not Gaskers. Please stop disrupting Wikipedia. --Omnipaedista (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fury 325

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fury 325 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom497 (talk) 12:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fury 325

The article Fury 325 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, recreate when actually built

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fury 325

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fury 325 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom497 (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fury 325

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fury 325 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom497 (talk) 12:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not social media or a rumour mill. We record things of note that can be reliably verified WP:V. This coaster seems to be just a rumour at present. If and when it is actually built, it may still not be notable enough for an article of its own. As a rumour, it isn't worthy of inclusion at all - see WP:CRYSTAL. Please stop adding this article until there is definite evidence that it exists, and is notable WP:GNG and that this can be proved with reliable independent sources WP:RS. Peridon (talk) 12:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Fury 325. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Original Research is when you add information that can not be backed up by reliable source(s). As much as you may know somethings that the public doesn't, if the info you know isn't published by a reliable source, it cannot be included. Even I have run into this case. I know things about several roller coasters that I wish I could add to their articles but because no reliable source(s) has published that info, I cannot add it. Also, regarding the Fury 325, a general rule that is followed on Wiki is that roller coaster/ride articles are NOT created until the official announcement, no matter how much info is 100 percent confirmed (which in the case of Fury 325, nothing was 100 percent confirmed). Finally, a good example of Original Research is in the Fury 325 article where you stated that the trademark got sold to Hershy. Not even the un-reliable sources you had stated that. And also, if a trademark got suspended, it would make no sense to sell it to another park so then can use it for the exact same purpose that got the trademark suspended in the first place. Thank-you. Dom497 (talk) 12:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Layout of Fury325.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Layout of Fury325.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fury 325

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fury 325 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom497 (talk) 11:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fury 325. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. We do not know what the name of the roller coaster will be. On that note, the fact that we may know it will be A roller coaster does not provide enough info for its own article (yet). Dom497 (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. --SuperHypercane (talk) 06:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fury 325

On 29 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fury 325, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, reaching a height of 325 feet (99 m), Fury 325 will become the world's tallest non-launched roller coaster when it opens in 2015 at the Carowinds amusement park? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fury 325. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 00:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kidz Bop 27

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kidz Bop 27 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ambiancé

The article Ambiancé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON at best; doesn't yet meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tempesto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tempesto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempesto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SuperHypercane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SuperHypercane. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CNN. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 11:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Killiondude (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperHypercane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But I was just being honest SuperHypercane (talk) 22:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.