User talk:SuperSaiyaMan

WFXT

Hi. I've reverted your edit to WFXT, as the criticisms are about Fox (and their Fox News Channel and Fox Sports Net networks) in general, and not WFXT in particular (WFXT is merely a Fox owned-and-operated station, it is not the Fox network itself). You might wish to keep this in mind for future reference. Thank you. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dexar Kariff. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you think an article should be deleted, please refer to WP:DELETE for instructions. Tckma 21:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was fanon, I deleted it since it was fanon.
- All well and good, but there is a process for such things. Please see Wikipedia's Deletion Process. Don't blank article pages. -- Tckma 21:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dexar Kariff

You can nominate this article for deletion if you want. Please read Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) for some guidelines on when articles about fictional characters are and aren't acceptable. If you then feel that this article should be deleted, you can use the procedure laid down in Wikipedia:Deletion policy - don't just blank it. Colonies Chris 23:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Second Samurai X OVA is non-canon...

Since the article is Himura Kenshin, this info doesn't have to be repeated. Additionally, such info shouldn't be written in the section title. Anyway, I've moved that down to a paragraph in the section.

By the way, please remember to sign your posts Seven 16:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gamera's Weight

SuperSaiyaMan, I have reverted your 'undoing' of my correction to Gamera's weight. The discussion section clearly explains the reason for correcting the weight. Your comment 'So you think the Blue Whale weighs thousands of tons?' makes no sense. As I stated, a blue whale can weigh up to 100 tons. Gamera is 4.5 times longer, and considerably thicker and wider than a blue whale. Additionally, it is obvious someone mistranslated the Japanese measurements, and this has propagated around the Web. Please leave the correct revision 'as is'. 71.135.108.20 (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC) And being 4.5 times larger, it wouldn't weigh in the thousands of tons.[reply]

He's dead, Jim?

When did Kishimoto confrim that. Give me proof please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasuke9031 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shonen Jump interview, few days ago. And Pein also confirmed him dead, so he is dead.

You know, you could have just replied on the talk page, but if you actually have a copy of that interview, you can certainly say "He's dead, Jim," and use that as a reference. Sasuke9031 (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sasuke vs Itachi

The reason is because the fight is just minor details. Its like describing all the fight he had with Deidara. Just pay attention to the part in the story of Naruto Uzumaki. Tintor2 21:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just minor details? This is a crucial moment-Sasuke has impaled his brother, and is now asking a crucial question. And according to Kishimoto, 2008 is the year of the Uchiha. It's not a minor detal at all. You may not like it, but this chapter has to be added to the plot overview.

Most moves were part of a genjutsu and its obvoius that the fight still not ended. The second fight between Naruto and Sasuke was the most important of Part I but we did not described it.Tintor2 21:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was added before someone deleted it. This fight, latest chapter, has to be added to plot overview. Espeically since Sasuke is about to ask a question.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Jiraiya (Naruto). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Either confirm the interview is real, or wait for one of the alternative confirmations that have been settled upon at Talk:Jiraiya (Naruto). ~Snapper T o 23:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pain says Jiraiya is dead, then Jiraiya thinks to himself. Dead people can't do that.

And the interview is not confirmed, as is evidenced by looking at any page of the associated topic where people ask for proof and receive none. The only evidence supporting the interview is a small group of people who say they were there and that Kishimoto said what the interview claims he said. What is needed to verify it is a transcript of the interview provided by Shueisha, Shonen Jump, or any place that doesn't rely on hearsay from forum-goers. As for its length, what is the likelihood that Kishimoto is only going to answer seven questions? That hardly makes for much of an "interview".

So please, find confirmation for the interview, or wait for someone who hasn't recently tried to kill Jiraiya say he is dead. ~Snapper T o 03:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pain calls Pa's fancy new tattoo a "dying message", and then focuses all of his attention on Pa, not Jiraiya. The ambiguity of the scene with Tsunade cannot be used as evidence as that would constitute original research. The article notes that Pain says he is dead, so the world will not come to an end if "deceased" isn't stuck next to his age. Just wait for confirmation by another character like the rest of us. ~Snapper T o 20:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - You're not making any sense man. Did you even read the chapters? And how is it Original Research again?

Jiraiya's death

keep adding it and see where it gets you--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 05:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your Opinion

If you find these articles "inadequate" then I suggest you instead look to the Naruto wikia for your informational needs, where eight pages of blow-by-blow plot synopsis about only two chapters are commonplace. On Wikipedia, such detail results in article deletion by dispassionate editors. Since neither of us wants that to happen, articles are mere summaries of KEY aspects of the subject, not an everything-there-is-to-know guide to Naruto. When Naruto does something of significance with or as a result of Jiraiya's death (ie. kills Pain out of vengeance) I assure you it will be mentioned. In the meantime, "Naruto is sad when he finds out Jiraiya is dead, so Iruka gives him a popsicle" adds nothing of value to the article. ~Snapper T o 20:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barack Obama, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 02:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC) --How is that vandalism for eliminating vandalism. Barak Obama's middle name is Hussien.[reply]

Nevermind...

Re:Naruto Uzumaki

I took a look at that article after I saw your complaint on another user's talk page and as I skimmed over it, I found no real issues with the article other than that "Killer Bee" is Wikilink to an African killer bee rather than Killer Bee and that I had to look up what those things that ended in "...kure" were. Any further info. than what is there right now would begin to fade into WP:CRUFT which is not recommended for the English Wikipedia. We try to keep a "less is more" mentality here, trying to state as much as we can in as few words as possible without going too into in-universe character history and things like that. I'm sure the Naruto.wikia does delve into the good details because that's what they're there for. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to keep the article as less as more as possible.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We mustn't every part from his abilities per wp:plot. This is not a fansite or a wikia, so we have to keep aboid details shown only in two pages.Tintor2 (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cherry Blossom Shockwave.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cherry Blossom Shockwave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sasuke Susanoo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sasuke Susanoo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:SuperSaiyaMan/Jeff Vilencia

That page was not appropriate for Wikipedia. I see you have many warnings on your talk page from the past. Please refrain from using Wwikipedia for your own purposes, and follow the rules. Thanks! Killiondude (talk) 06:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto Uzumaki

It's pretty minor to put in the abilities section, abilities that Naruto still has not aquired. It's like putting in the section, a list of all the abilities he has yet to learn.Tintor2 (talk) 12:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is it pretty minor? Naruto can't use Shadow Clones in his new form, he can't transform fully into the fox, and the Rasengan is making is completely different to the normal one.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because the abilities section is for the abilities Naruto can use, not the ones he can't use.Tintor2 (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Winter of 2010-2011 In New England

A tag has been placed on Winter of 2010-2011 In New England, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no reason given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toolsavoid e (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Winter of 2010-2011 In New England

Please tell me the page you are leaving a message about. "My page" means I need to go off and trawl your contribs, plus it's not "your page", merely the (a) page you created.
If you look at the message above you will see "No reason given".
The editor who tagged the article was not SmackBot.
I have declined the speedy, as no reason is given.
I hope other do contribute to the page, but don't let that stop you from finding some references.

Rich Farmbrough, 20:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

tag -lead to long - on fukushima power station disaster article

you placed a tag on the reacter accident article. I have taken it off because it is going to cause lots of trouble if it stays. There is already a discussion section about this on the talk page. Could you please state your suggestions there? Sandpiper (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winter of 2010-2011 in New England

The article Winter of 2010-2011 in New England has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article cites no references, and this doesn't appear to meet the notability of WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Firefox, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For a criticisms section like that you would need a WP:SECONDARY source to support your claim, not a fan (or enemy) forum. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of support forum is a primary source and not a reliable source. --Claw of Slime (talk) 03:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the main problem with the forum is being self-published and therefore unreliable. Self-published sources are not vetted for accuracy. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SuperSaiyaMan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SuperSaiyaMan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SuperSaiyaMan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]