User talk:SweetMilkTea13
Welcome to my Talk Page!
[edit]Feel free to message anything you'd like, and I'll respond shortly. SweetMilkTea13 (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Hindutva, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Narendra Modi for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Please also review the neutral point of view policy. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ben Shapiro. Thank you. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 08:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sean Hannity. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 08:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Liz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not attack other editor's and call them "extremists". This is a collaborative project and you need to work with editors, not simply complain about things you don't like. If you don't start contributing positively, you might find your stay here cut short. Liz Read! Talk! 03:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
NPOV
[edit]I agree with this sentiment personally but it's wildly inappropriate on Wikipedia and constitutes vandalism. Don't do this again. Praxidicae (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
@Praxidicae: Sorry dude, I was just so raged. SweetMilkTea13 (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 14th Dalai Lama seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Doggis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
American Politics Discretionary Sanctions
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 08:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
BLP Sanctions Alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
[edit]Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:SweetMilkTea13. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. [1] bonadea contributions talk 12:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Doug Weller talk 15:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Doggis
[edit]Hello, SweetMilkTea13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Doggis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)