User talk:Syed Shahzaman1

Welcome!

Hello, Syed Shahzaman1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Syed Shahzaman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ashley yoursmile! 13:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Syed Shahzaman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Syed Shahzaman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ashley yoursmile! 13:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Shahzaman (May 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syed Shahzaman1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have deleted your draft because the only place you are allowed to write about yourself is on your own user page. Note that you will NOT be allowed to link to your Youtube channel, blog, Instagram account or any other such content or to promote your skills, services, publications, recordings, etc. Deb (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hill Top Educational Institute

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Hill Top Educational Institute, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Hill Top Educational Institute where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Hill Top Educational Institute, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop moving this clearly inadequate draft into article space. It has no references and the school does not appear WP:Notable - Arjayay (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanku. I'll try to improve my draft first Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hill Top Educational Institute (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hill Top Educational Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 16:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hill Top Educational Institute

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2409:40D5:108F:4DA5:309F:4FD3:C286:285D (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect

Hill Top Educational Institute

Nomination of Hill Top Educational Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hill Top Educational Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill Top Educational Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ira Leviton (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hill Top Educational Institute. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Hill Top Educational Institute. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 15:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Syed Shahzaman1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Syed Karrar Hussain, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Syed Shahzaman1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Syed Shahzaman1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No its truely wrong 2409:40D5:108C:FFEE:9110:7F0D:A93E:DBF5 (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing uncited and poorly cited BLPs

You have been advised numerous times (above and below) about problems with your editing-- particularly with respect to Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. In addition to the problems noted already on your talk page, edits like these and these to Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi are unacceptable. Please read and understand WP:RS and WP:BLP; you must supply a reliable source that complies with BLP when editing biographies of living people. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr. Syed Karrar Hussain

The article Dr. Syed Karrar Hussain has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Maria Gemmi (talk) 12:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder: even in draft space, WP:BLP requires that you cite reliable sources about living people, including but not limited to their dates of birth. —C.Fred (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]