User talk:Tennlumni01

Welcome!

Hello, Tennlumni01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bradley Square Mall, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phearson (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley Square Mall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bradley Square Mall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phearson (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley Square Mall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bradley Square Mall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- gtdp ^(T)/_(C) 17:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Phearson (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bradley Square Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley Square Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Square Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Phearson (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Williamson County, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rena Scott

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rena Scott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444^Talk 19:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disco in 1980

Please explain on the 1980 in music talk page why you think it is important your addition regarding disco music is put in. There are a number of problems with it;

It is unsourced.
It is essentially an opinion rather than an actual event.
There is no indication whose opinion it belongs to. Including;
- Who has decided that Stevie Wonder's single is 'Disco'? It is not categorised as this in its article.
- Who has been categorising all singles since 1975, to note that this is the first time disco has been absent since then?
- Who determined that this is a notable event?

Your addition has been reverted three times now. Continuing to restore it into the article is disruptive and edit warring. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rena Scott

Hi. I've also just done a review of what you wrote in the Rena Scott article and notice that 90% of it is a straight copy from her website here] . This website is "Copyright 2013. Rena Scott . All rights reserved." You cannot simply copy text off copyrighed websites and paste it into Wikipedia. Also, apart from the copyright issues, the way it is phrased is obviously promotional and not of an acceptably neutral tone for an encyclopedia. If fixed some of it, but would appreciate it if you could rephrase and rework it further. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Regardless of how another editor acts, comments like this are never acceptable. If you feel the urge to do something like that in the future, please step away from your keyboard, take a walk, or do whatever you need to do to calm down. If you have any questions, you're welcome to ask me, and I'll be happy to help you out where I can. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Virginia Beach Arena. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Smjg (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Expansion of the National Basketball Association. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss the matter at Talk:Expansion of the National Basketball Association. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Expansion of the National Basketball Association. Please discuss the matter at Talk:Expansion of the National Basketball Association. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Expansion of the National Basketball Association, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tennlumni01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Phoenix metropolitan area, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phoenix metropolitan area. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - At this point your continued removal of cited material constitutes vandalism. If you have issues with the information on the page, please discuss it on the talk page of the article, so that consensus can be reached. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ellis County, Kansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anomaly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Space disco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmic Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Jackson 5 discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 23:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually realise you're causing an error on the page when you revert me? Check the table in your edit. It's broken. Don't be reverting editors if you don't know how to edit properly. Continue doing so and you'll be reported per WP:BRD. Ss112 13:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of shopping malls in Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westgate Mall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm SounderBruce. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not create stubs and new articles without citations, or they may be deleted for failing to assert their notability. Sounder Bruce 22:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Signal Hill Mall

The article Signal Hill Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small-town mall with no large retail anchors. Article was previously deleted via AfD a decade ago, and this stub isn't very comprehensive.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 22:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Signal Hill Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signal Hill Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal Hill Mall (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sounder Bruce 00:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sir Duke, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tennlumni01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1975–76 NBA season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Randy Smith

1978–79 NBA season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lloyd Free

1979–80 NBA season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gus Williams

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Gym

Hello Tennlumni01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Gym for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 16:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honey's Money, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harridan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]