Jump to content

User talk:Terminologistic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! --Darkwind (talk) 20:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks so much.Terminologistic (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please try to avoid blanking your talk page - it helps other users see what has already been discussed with you. The "new messages" banner will go away after you view the page - you don't have to erase it. --Darkwind (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Reason was... I am yet to find out if the following: Hudra, Tiamut, Malik_Shabazz, are really three different people...Terminologistic (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you we are three very different people. Take a look at our contribution histories. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite astonishing how you "three" all think alike and act together.Terminologistic (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. You're trying to insert a point of view that is contrary to what reliable sources say about Deir Yassin.
You can find our contribution histories at Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz, Special:Contributions/Huldra, and Special:Contributions/Tiamut. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1) Sometimes no? 2) your POV NPOV has more weight? 3) "palestine-remembered" site is not an opinion propaganda unreliable source?Terminologistic (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1) We don't have the same interests and we don't always agree with one another.
2) You don't know what my POV is. I restored the article to a neutral point of view that reflects what reliable sources say.
3) Please see what Palestine Remembered is being used for. Yes, I think it's a reliable source for the historical documents it hosts. And it's not a reliable source when its authors express their opinions. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The was they count the history of that "massacre" battle is ALSO opinionated.Terminologistic (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm; Tiamut is Palestinian and understands Arabic. I am Scandinavian, and understand Swedish, Danish, Norwegian and New Norwegian (they are quite related..), but not a word, not even a letter in Arabic. And you have not answered my earlier question, who were you before, if I may ask? Your very first edit here was very....proficient, I believe that is the English word? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Terminologistic. You have new messages at Tiamut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AN/I

[edit]

WP:ANI#User:LeeSeem. Huldra (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]