User talk:Tettyan

Again, welcome! --Thatdog (Talk) 18:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shin Corporation Corporate Size.

Hello My Name is Patranun Limudomporn (nrad6949),

I am on of contributors that contribute Shin Corporation article in Thai and English Language. As the current Shin Corp. is the biggest conglomerate in Thailand but Tettyan say it isn't. I think you might be wrong if you said that PTT is larger. I have clearly answer from CEO of PTT, Prasert Boonsamphan that PTT is only Enery Operation Holding not Conglomerate, so Shin Corporation is the biggest conglomerate in Thailand. (But if we said in common, not catagorized, PTT is the biggest.)

Regards, nrad6949

Recent block

I am terribly sorry about blocking you. I must have clicked the wrong username when I was blocking vandalism accounts. Please accept my apologies. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 04:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've unblocked the IP address, though I don't have much experience of this, so I can't be sure. Let me know of there are still problems. Mark ^{your words} 11:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thaksin Shinawatra / Thai Political Crisis of 2006

Well, even though we might be the big two editors right now, the wikipedia article for Thaksin is now ranked No. 4 (out of 1,940,000) in a google search for "Thaksin Shinawatra" - right behind the official Thai government website, the Thai Embassy in Washington, and the Bangkok Post General Election 2001. We even come up ahead of the official Thaksin.net site, the BBC profile, and the NYT profile!

Given the number of articles referencing Thailand and Thaksin in google news these days (in the hundreds), that means we have a lot of readers. Unfortunately, I don't think it is possible to get detailed traffic stats for the article to say how often it has been viewed.

But anyway, lots of views means that eventually someone out there will find mistakes and will start fixing them or at least comment on them. Lets keep up the good job! Patiwat 18:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nation Multimedia Group

Thanks for the heads-up Tettyan. As soon as I hit the page the first thing that rubbed me wrong was the name. You're right - it needs to be moved to Nation Multimedia Group, stat. I was actually thinking about doing a Kom Chad Luek entry in the next couple of days, but it's good to have an article for the whole group as well. I'll do what I can on the page, as I'm somewhat limited for time. I'm getting ready to take a break. Wisekwai 05:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sondhi's show and the King

I've responded to your note in the Sondhi Limthongkul article regarding his TV show and the King. I think the headline and the article body make it very clear. I prefer to use "allege" only when accusations are made in a newspaper without evidence. But not when the players involved go to the formality of a meeting with the King's secretary, and the royal knife comes down as a result. Would appreciate your thoughts. Patiwat 14:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for opinion on Thaksin Get Out

Thanks for weighing in on Thaksin Get Out. That article, as well as a few others like Lookkeh Long Tang, seem to have been made by some good intentioned th.wikipedia editors. th.wikipedia has had some growing pains, and it is a bit difficult to convince editors from it that en.wikipedia shouldn't contain original research, Thai references, copyrighted photos, unverified information, or blatantly POV article titles. Patiwat 08:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thaksin's legacy

The junta has said that it would review several of Thaksin's policies, leading me to review whether the Thaksin Shinawatra article covers the key policies that the junta will either damn or absolve. Turns out that the article made no mention at all about his CEO-governor policy, which was explicitly targetted by the junta. You're pretty up to date on things, so I was wondering whether you could have a looksie as well and see if the article is junta-proof and can stand on its own. Patiwat 23:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]