User talk:Themacman4me

Your comments

A memorial page is, I will agree, not something Wikipedia is for. However, there is no need to put "This article is bad" on the talk page. The page has been posted in good faith WP:AGF be someone who has lost a family member or friend. The article will be deleted, but it can be done with dignity not insult. I'm not suggesting you give up patrolling. I am suggesting you use a bit more tact. I can get quite coldly snotty with some arrogant company official who is trying to tell me how Wikipedia works. That is different. I know how far to go. I'm not sure you do yet. Cool it.... ;-| Peridon (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of articles

When you put up an article for speedy deletion, you should use a specific criteria rather than just the "delete" template. For example, on the Jake nowry page, you should have used the "db-g10" template when requesting speedy deletion, which puts up the page for speedy deletion as an attack page and blanks the page. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for the criteria and which templates to use for specific criteria. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Altering pages content

Please do not alter the content of pages tagged for speedy deletion unless they are tagged as attack pages. Also, please see what I replied on my talk page. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop altering the content of pages tagged for deletion. If you continue, I may find your edits to be WP:Disruptive. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use a rationale when you tag pages for deletion. Not just {{delete}} Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2015 Formula One season, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barney the barney barney

Hi. Your edits indicate you may be the user above. Is this true? Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

who is barney? and how

I dont think i am?

Ok. That's good. In the meantime, I invite you to take a look at this see what I was talking about, WP:Sock puppetry. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nubcaik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Nubcaik, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alex2564 (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC) OKay[reply]

Stop (Again)

Stop adding {{delete}} to pages without a rationale. I invite you to stop patrolling new pages right now and thoroughly read WP:CSD. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? I don't see any recent contributions from him placing that tag anywhere. Do you mean me? Alex2564 (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Laxmaster2013. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You have already been warned about this behavior. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sci-Fi timeline. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Themacman4me, you may be blocked from editing. Alex2564 (talk) 23:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Themacman4me, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alex2564 (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Cold Desert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alex2564 (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to the WP:AIAV because you are constantly disrupting Wikipedia by making unconstructive edits, blanking your talk page, deleting useful advice, and adding {{delete}} to pages without a rationale. Please stop. Alex2564 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I must insist that you stop blanking your talk page. It's not big enough for archiving. Alex2564 (talk) 23:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please just STOP spamming alex, dont edit war. i think you can get banned for spamming my talk page with my talk page!

Facepalm Alex2564 (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what?

I think Alex is making a good point with that facepalm. "I think you can get banned for spamming my talk page with my talk page" doesn't even make sense, which is likely why he had that reaction. What does that mean, anyway? Lugia2453 (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

spamming my talk page with THE talk page i had before can get you banned

--Themacman4me (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)--Themacman4me (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)--Themacman4me (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)--Themacman4me (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)--Themacman4me (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We must insist that you stop adding {{delete}} to pages like this without a rationale. You've been warned 2 times, now 3. Also, please stop deleting your talk page. People can still view your warnings in the history. You are just making things look worse for yourself. Alex2564 (talk) 23:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alex2564 (talk) 23:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to the WP:ANI to cut off your talk page access. Please stop. Alex2564 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page will not be deleted under ANY circumstances. You are a marble's length away from being blocked. Alex2564 (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Alex2564 (talk) 23:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Themacman4me (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page edits, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alex2564 (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop abusing your talk page. Alex2564 (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing your disruption after 15 warnings. An administrator will now choose to block your account. Please stop. Alex2564 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking this to WP:RFAR. It is obvious your only intention is you disrupt Wikipedia. Alex2564 (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have become incredibly annoying at this point. I will tell you this one last time. I ask you to STOP ABUSING YOUR TALK PAGE. Alex2564 (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — foxj 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting loss of talk page access... Alex2564 (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Also one blocking template is plenty. — foxj 00:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]