User talk:ToddWC

In August 2010 you placed a POV flag on eNom article, after a couple of thorough edits to balance the POV -- one of which included requests for comment posted to the entire community. In so doing, you inadvertently played into the hands of a perennial sock puppet of that article. Would you be so kind as to go through the history of the article, and consider removing the POV flag?

Guidelines in Neutral point of view (NPOV) include the guidance that it's appropriate for the content of an article to represent "... proportionately ... all significant views ... published by reliable sources." It's okay for an article to present reliably sourced positive material -- and many articles do -- as long as negative, reliably sourced, material gets proportional representation. Thanks, Thirdbeach (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)