User talk:Tprager

Welcome

Hello, Tprager, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 14:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Prager

Are you the subject of the article Timothy Prager? Thanks in advance for your reply - KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 15:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you may already know, Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopaedia written by its readers. It's important to realise that Wikipedia strongly discourages articles written by the subjects themselves or by others close to a subject because of the difficulty in writing objectively about yourself, your family, or your work. Please see Wikipedia:Autobiography for our guidelines on writing about yourself or topics you are personally involved with. While keeping in mind conflict of interest issues, please note that if someone does create an article about you, you should feel more than welcome to edit the article to ensure that each piece of information is factual and complying with our "Biography of Living Persons" policy. This policy can be viewed at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons.

Thanks for your comments however I think I am pretty well placed to know what the content of the film was - and am fairly horrified that others reduce it to a is Wakefield "right or wrong" discussion. The critical reaction to the drama was mixed - it received praise as well as criticism. When I can figure out how to cite the various positive reviews I will. It is alarming that people with particular agendas seem to hijack Wikipedia sites and do not exercise the objectivity you appear to encourage in your earlier comments.Tprager (talk) 03:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Tim, I will make my own views clear from the start. I remember watching the play when it was shown. I felt it was the most replusive, morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest drama that I have ever seen. So, you see, my views on the matter are quite stong. Remembering my anger still makes me nauseous. What I found repellant was the way the audience was emotionally manipulated to support the unsupportable. I think everyone who was involved with it should hang their heads in shame forever. At the very least, now that the truth is clear, the facts should be accepted honestly. Your attempts to weasel your way out of the truth with nonsense such as "no definitive proof has yet been found linking the MMR to the onset of autism" are wholly unacceptable outright distortions of the truth. There is no link. The last sentence of your initial addition is pure baloney: "Ironically, such a link was never made in either Wakefield's Lancet paper nor in the film "Hear the Silence"." The drama made the link consistently thoughout - from the very first scenes. You know it. You wrote it. Now you try to deny it. Paul B (talk) 08:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, if your views are that strong you should probably not be editing the article either. Please remember to maintain a neutral POV. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 23:46, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Timothy Prager. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. I understand you are the subject of this article; please understand we cannot publish your original thoughts and views here. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 23:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]