User talk:Tru100

July 2020

Hello, I'm Demonichellbringer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Barnard without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — — — Demonichellbringer (Discussion) 19:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I myself am a Barnard and I found that the history of our family was almost completely inaccurate. A family member's DNA test Says 66% English and Welsh, 26% Irish and Scotish, and the rest was Germanic and French ancestry. The point being our family is not Jewish, Nor were we ever. The Barnard's came to England after the invasion of the Normans in 1066. It came from The French surname Barnard. Not saying that Jewish families don't have the family name, but the family name has a different origin. Tru100 (talk) 03:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strickland

The content you are adding to the Strickland page has several problems, as explained on the Talk page, notably it treats the same place (Strickland, historically in Westmorland but now in Cumbria) as if it were two separate locations/two separate origins for the surname. One part of it is also redundant, and another part is desperately in need of sourcing. Please respond to the concerns and reach consensus on the Talk page rather than repeatedly inserting the same problematic material. (See policy WP:BRD on the need to achieve consensus on Talk pages rather than repeated reversion.) Agricolae (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Surname is a part of my family history, in fact it's my mother's maiden name. The name very likely goes further than the 12th century in Westmoreland. A DNA test said we were mostly Irish and Scottish, a bit of Native American, a small amount of Italian, and Dutch. The point being there was direct connection to England. We found that the earliest records of strickland and/or Stercaland were found in West Scotland, and Cumbria. The original people of Cumbria go as far in history as the Celtic tribes, as do the Cornish, The Welsh, The Manx, and the Mancunians. So the Strickland family may be a common family name in England, and it's certainly of Cumbric origin and they moved to the nearby Scottish Counties. It's possible that some of the Strickland families later moved from Scotland to England. Today there are still families with this name in Scotland and even Ireland. Tru100 (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Strickland family is not the only Scottish family that originated in Cumbria. If you research you'll find that popular Scottish surnames like Johnston and Cummings actually originated in Cumbria. Tru100 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to hit the main points here:

1) Just because your DNA shows certain ethnicities doesn't mean those apply in any way applies to the origin of a surname going on 900 years ago. You would inherit, on average, 0.00006% of your DNA from this 12th century Strickland - essentially zero, so the ethnic proportionality of any living person cannot be used to address this question. (Further, not to put too fine a point on it, but maybe your grandfather was born to a liaison your great-grandmother had with the milkman, and not her Strickland husband, for all we know.)

2) The name of the town certainly can be presumed to go before the 12th century, but the surname does not, because this is about the earliest that anyone in Britain used surnames. Prior to that time, they used patronymics or simply a single name. This does not mean that the family or families that later used the surname didn't have deep Celtic or Norman or Anglo-Saxon roots, but the page we are talking about is Strickland (surname) - it is about the surname and those who bore the surname, and when it talks about the origin, it is talking about the origin of the surname and not the ethnic derivation of the people who came to bear it. All this talk of Celtic tribes and Mancunians is fundamentally missing the point.

3) You keep trying to make this a Scottish name, while admitting that it comes from Cumbria, which is in England. Further, you keep trying to draw a distinction between a Scottish surname Strickland in Cumbria and an English surname from Strickland in Westmoreland, when the two are exactly the same place, Westmoreland being the historical county that encompasses some of the same area as the regional designation (and modern Ccounty) of Cumbria, and the Strickland we are talking about in one is the one we are talking about in the other.

4) That there are people of this name in Scotland and Ireland now is meaningless. There are people of this name in Kansas, but that doesn't make it a Kansas surname in the sense that we are using it.

5) What is missing in all of this attestation of yours is something that is very important on Wikipedia. One of Wikipedia's core policies is WP:Verifiability. That means that everything on Wikipedia should have a source, and when material is added without a source, such as the material you are adding, then it can be challenged and removed for that reason alone, and when this is done, it should not be restored without a source. I have pointed this out multiple times, yet you seem to claim your own personal knowledge as a source - it isn't.

6) Even were there to be a source, you haven't provided a good explanation why a surname that arose from a place in England and that gave rise to a lot of notable people in England and that is documented by references to be an English surname, must instead, in your rendering, be regarded as first and foremost a Scottish surname because some people with the name deriving from the English village happened to go to Scotland too. We don't get to pick what we are going to call it based on our own personal preference, as you seem to be doing.

7) You fail to address here why you think the etymological origin of the toponym absolutely must go in the lede of the article when it is already in the body of the article. Surely we don't need to say the same thing twice, and the body is the better place for it for the reason I have given several times now.

Agricolae (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How would it be only 0.00006% of my DNA when my ancestors would be supposedly living in England for at least 600 years, and my ancestors could only have a family with other English women? My DNA would result in a little more than 0.00006% English Blood. If it Also it's true that Cumbria, and other historic counties in Northern England were settled by Celtic groups such as the Berks, Parisi, and Brigantes. Considering that Cumbric Family names were most definitely named before the invasion of the Danes, Normans, and Saxons. When the first Strickland was around he/she would not be mixed with Norse, Norman, or German. Scotland was also Celtic before the Danish Invasion. I'm not saying that Cumbria isn't an English County, but if before the invasions were to move from Cumbria to Scotland and interbreed with the Scots. That family wouldn't have any English Blood. If you look at records you'll find that the Stricklands have been living in Scotland for hundreds of years, and my DNA results in Scottish. It's not at all Coincidental. You could say that Strickland is a Scottish and old Cumbric English Surname, but ethnically most bearers of the surname Strickland have no English at all, So it's technically untrue to say it is. Tru100 (talk) 00:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't talking about all of your DNA, we are talking about the Stricklands, and so unless you are massively inbred in your ancestry, the amount of your DNA that came from the 12th century Stricklands, and hence could tell us anything about the ethnicity of the first Stricklands, is both vanishingly small and impossible to sort out from the rest of your DNA that did not come from the Stricklands. Further, contrary to the marketing of the DNA testing companies, one cannot distinguish southern lowland Scotland from the borderlands of England genetically - the genetics are a continuum that does not respect modern political boundaries.

As to Cumbrian surnames arising prior to the invasion of the Danes, there is simply no evidence for this: British toponymic surnames are an innovation not seen until the Anglo-Norman era. There were toponyms found in some records prior to this point indicating where the specific individual lived or owned land, but these did not pass from one generation to the next - if someone 'of Strickland' moved north, the next generation would have been called 'of Lasswade' (or wherever they ended up).

The big problem here is that you are trying to argue your point based on what you believe to be true. Wikipedia does not use personal knowledge, but sources. You could say that Strickland is Scottish . . . . - this is not about what I could say, or what you could say, but about what sources say. To include Scottish as an ethnicity of the surname at all, let alone the predominant surname, we need a source that identifies the name as Scottish, not just your personal belief that is the case, or at a minimum, a very early bearer appearing in a Scottish context, not a modern person who identifies as Scottish and has the surname. Agricolae (talk) 09:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schnipper (Surname) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Schnipper (Surname), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 22:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Schnipper (Surname)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Schnipper (Surname) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 02:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Schnipper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schnipper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schnipper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Lennart97 (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abasi

Please note that disambiguation pages like Abasi are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Per MOS:DABINTRO, the intro for a disambiguation page should be extremely simple, such as "Abasi may refer to". The other information that you added should go on a name page, not a DAB page.

Disambiguation pages with surnames

When disambiguation pages include surnames and other topics, such as Schnapper, Sabara, Abano, Aben, and Shada, they should not include surname information at the top. If you would like to explain the name meaning and origin, please create the relevant name page with wp:reliable sources.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billman (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FitzBernard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FitzBernard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 13:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kriksciun

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kriksciun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MADdi0X (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mak Kriksciun

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mak Kriksciun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vroman

Please note that disambiguation pages like Vroman are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

If you wish to write about the surname Vroman, you could consider starting an article Vroman (surname). The material that you added to Vroman will need to be sourced or someone will remove it. Leschnei (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]