User talk:Truong Gia Bao112

Jhgff

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cheraw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yuchitown (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mohawk people, you may be blocked from editing. Yuchitown (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kalinago without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donald Albury 13:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop trying to reinsert your desired edits into Native Americans in the United States. They are not helpful. On Wikipedia we gain consensus on an articles talk page once it is determined that content is contentious. The onus is on you to gain consensus to change "First Americans" to "Indians". Do not try to re-add until you gain that consensus to do so. --ARose Wolf 11:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Native Americans in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. ARose Wolf 12:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Native Americans in the United States. You have been warned multiple times to stop adding redundant material to the lead, but continue to do so. Netherzone (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Native Americans in the United States, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Netherzone (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious edits

You appear to be in a dispute on Native Americans in the United States. You have been warned that your edits are disruptive. You have been invited to discuss on the article talk page but have thus far refused. Your refusal to address the warnings you received from other editors about your edits to the article, communicate with other editors about your edits, or even leave an edit summary explaining your edits is the very definition of disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted by six different editors. Please stop adding the edits back in the article and discuss. --ARose Wolf 16:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truong_Gia_Bao112 reported by User:Moxy (Result: ). Thank you. Moxy- 02:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Native Americans in the United States. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 02:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Native Americans in the United States for persistent edit warring. The article talk page remains open to you to discuss your proposed changes.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you have evaded your partial block, I have modified your block to site-wide.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]