User talk:Valreed93

Welcome!

Hello, Valreed93, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Black Girl Bill of Rights, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Girl Bill of Rights

The article Black Girl Bill of Rights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of "significant coverage" required by WP:GNG. Seems to fail WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Girl Bill of Rights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Girl Bill of Rights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Girl Bill of Rights until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of deletion

Hi - I thought I'd come and explain why the Black Girl Bill of Rights is almost certainly going to be deleted. If it were up to the majority of us on Wikipedia, pages for initiatives like this would remain because we know that the initiative's intentions are good.

However unfortunately every article has to have sources in it that assert how the topic is notable per Wikipedia's guidelines and only a very specific type of sourcing can accomplish this. These sources have to not only be independent of the topic itself (in this case an initiative) but they also have to be non-trivial and in places Wikipedia would consider to be reliable. This can be exceptionally difficult, especially when you have something that is essentially a grassroots campaign from what I can see, since those are so frequently overlooked by most RS until they're exceptionally large in scope. Even then it's not a guarantee. It's not right or fair that you have news groups focusing on celebrities every time they so much as burp, but the coverage has to be there.

Now what I'd highly, highly recommend is that you look into making your own wiki for this initiative. Places like Wikia are excellent for this, as you can pretty much add whatever you want as long as it doesn't run afoul of their guidelines, which mostly only look at things that are blatantly illegal (violence, drugs, etc), so I don't think that you'd have an issue if you wanted to repost this content on Wikia. I'd actually recommend that you make an entire wiki for the Black Girls Movement as a whole, to be honest. It deserves to be recorded somewhere. I can e-mail you whatever content you need from the page, if you'll enable your e-mail. (Wikipedia won't send you anything except for notifications about people posting on your talk page or on articles you created.)

I hope that this explains things a little. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GGE-Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GGE-Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girls for Gender Equity

Hello, Valreed93. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Girls for Gender Equity, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GGE-Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GGE-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Girls for Gender Equity

Thank you for starting this article. I hope you don't mind, but I added the article to Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related content as part of an ongoing Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT articles between now and the end of June, feel free to update this page with your contributions. Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joanne N. Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joanne N. Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne N. Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting our editathons

Thank you for contributing to our June 2016 editathons
There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment,
55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ

Host: Women in Red
June 2016
#wikiwomeninred

Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame

--Ipigott (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Your draft article, Draft:Girls for Gender Equity

Hello, Valreed93. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Girls for Gender Equity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]