User talk:Von de leorde

Hi why is Sushant Singh Rajput death still showing as hanging when it is under investigation please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.33.235 (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Von de leorde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Charlotte Brontë. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 06:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Madhubala, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Madhubala. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 15:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meena Kumari's Other Names

First of all, congratulations for your edits, you're doing great work. Secondly, if you are unsure about anything given in a particular article then first of all go through the reference points attached to it (detailed list of references is given at the bottom of the article). If you don't find mentioned claims in the references of the article then delete it without thinking twice. :) Regards!

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Meena Kumari. I can't comprehend why you would decide to change the title of a cited article to contradict that cited article's title. DMacks (talk) 19:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shyama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zeenat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Madhubala

I undid much of your edit. Please use an encyclopedic wp:tone and avoid using wp:puffery. This is an encyclopedia, not a publicity magazine. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 10:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Madhubala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dulari

Sadhana Shivdasani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arzoo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Madhubala, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

burial_place v. resting_place

See template:infobox actress the "burial_place=" field is for a body that has been buried. "resting_place=" is for location of ashes / cremated remains. Madhubala was buried. Jim1138 (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madhubala. - Arjayay (talk) 11:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lillian Hellman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chilmark

Madhubala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dulari

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madhubala, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mazhar Khan, Shammi and Nigar Sultana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Achala Sachdev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Waqt, Sangam, Arzoo and Miss Mary

Suraiya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hindustani

Waheeda Rehman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bees Saal Baad

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Achala Sachdev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sangam

Barbara Cartland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hatfield

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Geeta Dutt

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://bollywoodhelpline.com/editor-39-s-pick/bollywood/Geeta-Dutt-%E2%80%93-she-never-sang%20she-glided-through-the-tunes/13742. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sadhana Shivdasani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feroz Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=It wasn't me who removed that much part in the Wikipedia of Meena Kumari ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your addition to Geeta Dutt has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grace Aguilar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Von de leorde. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madhubala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mastani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Madhubala. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Your addition to Madhubala has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the first time you have been warned about this problem. You have already been blocked for other unacceptable edits, so you know we are serious about our policies. You might want to think carefully about your continued work here, and whether you can live up to our expectations. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Noor Jehan, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Newhall Follett

Hi there, I have reverted your changes to Barbara Newhall Follett as I think they need a source. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Madhubala

Please review your non encyclopedic edit [1]. You have been informed about it in the past too [2]. Please read WP:TONE and WP:LARD. Thanks ML⁹¹¹ 11:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naagin (2015 TV series), without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Begoon 10:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On Removing Edits

You cannot remove beneficial edits of Naagin (2015 TV series). We are adding plots but you are deleting them as if you have the right to do so everytime. There are lots of confusion in the show that is why it's necessary to write about each of the characters. Von de leorde (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:PLOT. Plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words, therefore I suppose it would be reasonable to have a summary of that length per series, so I've removed the "plot" tag. However, the plot summary should be a summary, not intricate details of the day-to-day trivial incidents in a show. Where I have removed large sections it has been because they have been giant walls of impenetrable text, almost completely impossible to understand in English. This is the English wikipedia, and text needs to abide by the high standards of grammar required by an encyclopedia, not some stream-of-consciousness unfathomable outpouring of semi-literate trivia.

Also, from the number of warnings I see on this page it occurs to me that you might do better to worry about your own editing than mine. Thank you. -- Begoon 10:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naagin (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Goo Hara, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. robertsky (talk) 04:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No I did a mistake. So next time I'll surely add a citation with my changes. Thank you so much😀 Von de leorde (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Naagin (2015 TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [3] Violates WP:CRYSTAL. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naagin (2015 TV series), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diffs: [4] It's unclear why you removed the cleanup template when you did nothing to make the plot shorter. Also, where did the Plot section go? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to ask you why is it bothering you if I removed the templates after resolving the problem. You don't want to see a long plot right so as you wished I did. Von de leorde (talk) 04:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How did you resolve the problem? Season 1 is almost 700 words instead of 500 max. Season 3 is pushing 1000 words, and Season 4 is well over 900. So if the maintenance template was pointing out that per WP:TVPLOT, season summaries shouldn't exceed 500 words, then I'd sure love to know how you resolved the problem. Because from what I see, you moved about 3 sentences to S5 and cut a handful of words from S4, but everything else is the same. Please let me know what observational mistakes I'm making here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

😁okay then I'll reduce the word limits and mention the episode updates as citations. Von de leorde (talk) 05:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sushant Singh Rajput

I suggest that you read the Frequently asked questions at Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput and also read up on what a reliable source is. Wikipedia goes with what reliable, verifiable, independent sources say, not wild speculation from anyone who wants to peddle their views on social media or media outlets that are prepared to publish such material. Neither is it about having the article say what fans want it to say, fans who apparently will try and discredit anyone who doesn't say something they agree with.

If maintaining Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and verifiability make me a "MF bastard" as you called me in this edit then I'll wear that badge with pride. However you make a personal attack on anyone else like that and I will block you immediately. Nthep (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this warning. Von de leorde, if you want to edit at Wikipedia, you'd better quickly get up to speed on editing norms. Read WP:FRINGE. No official with first-hand knowledge of the case has determined Rajput's death a homicide, which makes your changes indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Mz7 (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop leaving messages for SineBot

Re: your messages here and here, please stop leaving messages at User talk:SineBot. This is not a user's talk page, this is the talk page related to a "bot" account, or a piece of software that performs automated tasks. I'm sure you can now understand how pointless it is asking non-sentient software to explain why Nthep made an editing choice. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhk I understand whatever you have written. But I wanted to ask that can a Wikipedia editor charge us with sanctions if we continue making the same mistake over and over????? Von de leorde (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That should be obvious. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm KyloRen3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Prajakta Koli, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KyloRen3 (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiiii Sir, no it has not been removed Von de leorde (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naagin (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishal Mishra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the plot summary of Naagin (2015 TV series) have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 04:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]