User talk:Wabbit98

Please stop!

Hi ... Please stop removing players from the MLB roster pages if they're still on the 40-man rosters. Just because they are optioned to a minor league team, doesn't mean they are no longer on the 40-man roster. Thanks. --Sanfranman59 00:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Unproductive new article monitoring

You have placed an A7 tag on K Ja Nu 29 seconds after it was created. Did you even read it? Please stop doing this immediately - this is an encyclopedia, not a shooting range. Please treat other users' work with respect. -- Y not? 05:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Restoring removed PROD tags

I see that you restored a PROD tag to Billz after it had been removed. A PROD is only for uncontroversial deletions. If a PROD is contested by removing the tag, then it is not uncontroversial, and the tag may not be restored. In this situation if you still wish to have the article deleted you must use either speedy deletion or an article for deletion discussion. On this occasion the article clearly satisfies speedy deletion criterion A7, but if it did not satisfy one of the speedy criteria then an AfD would have been the only possible means of deletion once the PROD had been contested. I am telling you this so you can avoid the mistake of restoring a removed PROD another time. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Hi. Thanks for tagging Sophie Anne Christenson just now, but after you tag a page for speedy deletion you should copy to the author's talk page the warning which is generated for you on the speedy template, towards the bottom. Otherwise the newbie author doesn't know what's happened, thinks s/he pressed the wrong button, and often just puts the article in again. Also, if it's a new contributor who has never had a Welcome message, it's useful to give one before the speedy warning - it makes it less BITEy, and gives useful links that may help him do better next time. {{subst:firstarticle|<article name>}} is a good one. Keep up the good work - New Page Patrol needs all the eyes it can get! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

John Baker (artist)

You misunderstood what was happening with that page. Wikipedia:WikiProject Dictionary of National Biography is engaged in importing articles from Wikisource to work on here. Wikisource keeps the reference material, while the article here is categorised, edited further, has other references and images added, and so on. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wabbit98. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wabbit98. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

April 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop doing these mass edits that are partial updates to the census. You're confusing between years. You failed to do any previews, you're orphaning references, and some of them need to be redone.[1] — Smuckola(talk) 16:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

I am not confusing between years. I am removing old 2019 orphan references if I see them. So provide proof or stop attacking me with false allegations you asshole.

No personal attacks

Name-calling like this is unacceptable per WP:NPA. Do not resort to petty name calling, just plainly discuss disputes at hand. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plana School (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plana School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Wabbit98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plana School has been accepted

Plana School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 11:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

misspelled orphan pages

Hi. While I understand that you have good intentions, it is not helpful to link pages that are orphaned because they are misspelled without fixing the misspelling, as you did with "Carabus hummeli hummeli", a misspelling of Carabus hummelii hummelii, or "Calosoma nyassicus", a misspelling of Calosoma nyassicum. Please, if an article has a misspelled title, fix the title by moving the article to the correct spelling, and that usually will de-orphan it. The way you're doing it creates a lot more work. Thanks, Dyanega (talk) 18:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yefrosyniya Zarnytska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pervomaisk. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Your recent editing history at Galaxy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop. Three editors now agree: your addition is not suitable. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

The next step here is for you to make the case for your addition in Talk:Galaxy, seeking consensus from other editors. You could respond to my post, Talk:Galaxy#Bananas or create your own. To learn more about the process, check out Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

• To Johnjbarton (talk) I dispute the undoing of edits and that it is too soon and demand a third-party arbitration (and someone who is not one of your Wiki "friends") to make a decision. User:Wabbit98, August 12, 2024

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azadeh Bokaie Dadgar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)