User talk:Wadamarow

The statment says that on Liban zone Dagodia is majority, it may be so but it doeS not say any thong about Hawadle (Alagumar and Abdi Yusuf) which I think as much as Dagodia it selv. Thankz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.192.153 (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wadamarow! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —Bagumba (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 2020 United States men's Olympic basketball team, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:TIES, American English is used in this article. The team is treated as singular and not plural. You can refer to American_and_British_English_grammatical_differences#Subject-verb_agreement. —Bagumba (talk) 18:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your recent editing history at Awdal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dabaqabad (talk) 01:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dabaqabad Hi, since we cannot come to an amicable agreement I propose we let a 3rd party mediate between us, I'm happy to accept any ruling that comes from it. I hope you'll agree that's the best way to move forward. Wadamarow (talk) 01:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dabaqabad (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AE statement

Hello Wadamarow! With regard to this: the mandatory use of the talk page in the editing restriction only applies to reverts, so there has been no violation since a few days. You might want to correct that in your statement. Also, it would help if you would try to be less inflammatory. This must be a difficult situation for the editor involved, so let's try to keep it as little unpleasant as possible! Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 22:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Apaugasma thank you for correcting me on that last part, I have removed it and toned down on my language. Sometimes during topics such as these emotions get the better of us! But I will keep that in mind in the future. Wadamarow (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal

The October Arbitration request concerning Dabaqabad seems to have gone stale [1]. However, one of the root backdrops for the request, i.e. removal of sourced content seem to have been resumed by said editor, see for example (here). Do you think the request should be resumed? Heesxiisolehh (talk) 00:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Heesxiisolehh, thank you for informing me. User Dabaqabad has had a 6 month topic ban on all East Africa related pages, he's actually not authorised to edit the Laascaanood page or any other East Africa page given that the admins decided to ban him in October following his case. Wadamarow (talk) 01:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Apaugasma, it seems Dabaqabad has been editing East African pages lately despite his 6 month topic ban which was instated by the admins in October. Is it possible to reopen arbitration against the User? Best Wadamarow (talk) 01:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Heesxiisolehh I have just looked at the arbitration page and you're quite right, it has indeed gone stale with no final decision made. Do you know how to best reopen the case? Or perhaps User: Apaugasma? Thanks, Wadamarow (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The admins whom partook the last time were User:RegentsPark, User:HighInBC, User:Deepfriedokra, User:El C. Since I didn't participate in the last Arbcom request, do you think it pertinent that you message one of these admins to ask them to reexamine the case? Heesxiisolehh (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are currently engaged in a dispute with Dabaqabad it's usual procedure for you to open the case, or resume the archived one just as the other user did last time. I can give a supporting statement in the case with proof from other East African pages the user broke rules on as I done before. I think that's the best way to start the case.Wadamarow (talk) 20:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heesxiisolehh Wadamarow (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have made an Edit [2] on the Awdal article whilst the RFC is still going on and has not been concluded yet when you yourself is participating, even though numerous editors have agreed that sources should remain. Hawkers994 (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]