User talk:WarriorYt43

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Adil Raja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Adil Raja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adil Raja (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The BLP relies on some unreliable sources, lacks a NPOV, and still promotional in nature. Additionally, it fails to meet WP:N.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adil Raja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WarriorYt43! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changes related to "List of Serving Generals of Pakistan Army"

Dear Wikipedian? Could you please undo the changes to revision by 21:30, 2 May 2024. as there is no reference in change of command of Corps Commander I. 103.167.158.77 (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adil Raja (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not ready yet and raised issues not addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adil Raja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing warning

Hi. I'm Barkeep49, an editor and administrator on Wikipedia. Recently you attempt to pay to have Draft:Adil Raja accepted from Articles for Creation. I can see that you are attempting to follow Wikipedia rules and to behave ethically. This is why I have not blocked you. However, I must firmly warn you against attempting to pay anyone to accept the article ever again. Wikipedia rules do not permit someone to accept an article for pay (in Wikipedia lingo this would be paid tool use); this is stricter than the rules which allow for someone (with proper disclosure) to be paid fro editing (or suggesting edits). Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Sincerely, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying my best to follow Wikipedia rules and behave ethically. I just don't appreciate the unjust behavior by the reviewer towards the draft I made. I worked on it for months. I contacted another Wikipedia editor, and he told me that Saqib (the person who declined my article) would take some money. Out of frustration, I offered Saqib some money. Well, that was my mistake. I'll make sure not to do that again moving forward. WarriorYt43 (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adil Raja has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adil Raja. Thanks! Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adil Raja has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adil Raja. Thanks! Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adil Raja has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adil Raja. Thanks! Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]