User talk:Waterwindsail

Speedy deletion of Greenhouse Nursing Home

A tag has been placed on Greenhouse Nursing Home, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ralph Sperry, Ph.D.

I have nominated Ralph Sperry, Ph.D., an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Sperry, Ph.D.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your renewed question on my talk page

Thank you for your renewed question on my talk page. I will respond in full a little later today however in the meantime - please note I have struck out the comments by user:Igorberger - he has not been requested to answer questions on my behalf (and will be requested not to do so), he is a junior editor on wikipedia and probably does not understand the etiquette of allowing people to answer their own questions. --VS ^talk 22:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I've looked again at your questions regarding this matter on my talk page. I think my best answer is to suggest that you open up a special sandbox page to attempt recreation of the article. If you do create there you will be able to keep it for a short period of time and try to get it to a stage where other editors - preferably senior ones! - will be able to tell you whether it is safe to bring it back to mainspace. Please understand that bringing it back before it is ready can be considered disruption. If you want help with the process of setting up a recreation page please let me know at any time. Best wishes--VS ^talk 22:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Waterwindsail/Sandbox

Hi there - have had a quick look and appreciate the work you have completed so far. I have the following suggestion. Please write to all of the editors who opposed or supported the page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Sperry, Ph.D. and ask them for their input on the newly created version on sandbox talk page. This will give you a very good litmus test on what established editors say now and some valid pointers to adjust your article (or trash it if it isn't salvageable). Please make sure that you provide a direct link to the sandbox so that it is easily found. You can go to the link I have provided for you at the AfD to see who was a party to the discussion. I suggest that if you ask politely and give them a few days most if not all will be supportive. If you need any further help let me know.--VS ^talk 06:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Waterwindsail/Sandbox‎

I would appreciate it if you contacted me to detail how this sandbox article is being adjusted as soon as possible, else, unfortunately I will have to look at having it deleted. Please come back to me on my talk page. Best wishes. --VS ^talk 07:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Green House (nursing home)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Green House (nursing home), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Green House (nursing home) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Green House (nursing home), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ralph Sperry, from its old location at User:Waterwindsail/Dr Ralph Sperry. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 04:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Sperry (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Sperry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Waterwindsail, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]