User talk:Welcometothenewmillenium

Talkback

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 08:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello Welcometothenewmillenium, my name is Howicus. I noticed your signature blinks. I'm afraid that a blinking signature is against Wikipedia's Signature policy, specifically this section, Appearance and color. If you could change that, I'd appreciate it. No huge deal, just something you should know. Howicus (talk) 01:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, per WP:SIGLENGTH, please trim your sig down to about 255 chars. At 346 it's a good deal longer than it should be! Primefac (talk) 22:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- User:Primefac What was wrong with my signature I just need a better explanation on what went wrong? Is my username too long? Is it the message paragraph that I left on a user's talk page? I want to know to improve it for better. This time I'm leaving the post unsigned just to be safe. --- unsigned user 22:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's simply too long. Look at this diff. Your sig is longer than your comment. Ideally the code you use for your signatures should be no greater than 255 characters (including spaces). Primefac (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Technopat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to I Wish Tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Just seen your video and I love it!!! How would you girls like to come on tour with me?xxx(: The girls of [[Fifth Harmony]] We're beyond excited to be on tour with @CherLloyd! We wanna make

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 3)

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Welcometothenewmillenium, thanks for creating List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 3)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 1

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for creating the page for Camila Cabello. I recently worked on it and I learned a lot about her. Then I found out that my daughter is a HUGE Fifth Harmony fan. It gave me and my daughter something fun to talk about. :)

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hi. I noticed you've been editing the Gay icon article recently. Please do carefully consider if the names you are adding are truly "icons", especially to the already bloated list for the 2010s section. I removed some of the names you added as the sources did not state (or at least strongly imply) that they are gay icons. If you find reliable sources that do, feel free to re-add those names with the new sources. From the article's talk page, this section has gotten out of hand in the past, becoming an indiscriminate list of every celebrity who has ever spoken out in support of lgbt folks, which doesn't necessarily make them icons. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bennv3771 (talk) - Hi, um thanks for giving me your concerned feedback ... However, please tell me which edits did you reverse of mine in Gay Icons? I can understand reversing Ricki Lake ... However, my reason have you seen the other citation on other Icons and Idols? Some of the Icons do not have citation either maybe you want to take another look at those on the other hand I made several edits and added names of people who are truly "Gay Icons". I even cited them myself with the correct and credit giving to the site. Tell me, how are my sources not strong enough or convening enough about them being gay role models? If you don't have an answer for that maybe you can search and research yourself to see if they are Icons or not with you telling me that they are not. I worked real hard trying to come up with sources to prove that they are. If you don't think the citation is making them strong enough to be icons maybe you could add a source to help make it strong or find out if they are not instead of removing them? ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM _(Talk) 12:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. The names you added that I removed were: Chris Evans, Channing Tatum, Megan Fox and Ricki Lake. I removed them NOT because I don't think they are gay icons, but because the sources you cited didn't state/strongly imply that they are. The sources cited for Evans and Tatum say they support LGBT rights etc...but that doesn't make someone a gay icon as was discussed here: talk page. There's nothing in those sources to suggest they are seen as icons within the lgbt community. For Fox, the source was just about her being lgbt...being lgbt doesn't automatically make someone a lgbt icon. This is an article about gay ICONS, not gay role models. If you can find sources that state (or strongly imply) that these people are gay icons, then go ahead and add them again with these new sources. And if some of the other people listed in the articles don't have sources cited that state/strongly imply they are icons, then please help remove them as well. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add, a gay icon is described at the start of the article as "A gay icon is a public figure (historical or present) who is embraced by many within lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities." Hence, sources would preferably outright state they are "gay icons" or at least state that they have a large lgbt following or are highly regarded within the lgbt community. Hope this helps. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gay Icon response

Bennv3771 (talk) Thank you, for the feedback I revised Channing Tatum. That's the only one I redid so far.. The source states that Tatum has a massive gay following and is adored and admired by the gay community. To me that sums up on why he's a gay icon. Even though they might not use the words "Gay Icon". It talks about how gay men worship him and not only him supporting the LGBT community but him being aware of his support and being compared to other gay Idols/Icons. To me I feel as though he's an Icon because, he's been publicized for many years about being a huge role model for the gay community. Sorry, for the mixed confusion on cited links maybe, I needed a better source for them. However, I wanted you to be aware of other names mentioned without citation because, I took a look on the talk page and yes I see lots of mixed confusion. I however, felt a little attacked by your edits because, I felt like you were personally attacking me when I'm only trying to help improve the Biography. When I see other names still listed but my are being taken down by you or other users but theirs are not taken down by you or other users? It gets me confused and taken back a bit. You did clarify your reasoning behind all of it and that gave me a change of feeling no harm down. ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM _(Talk) 4:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

My edit wasn't meant as a personal attack on you. Apologies if it came across that way. Haven't looked at the source for Channing Tatum, but if it says he has a large gay fanbase then that definitely fits "gay icon". I was actually looking into removing some of the other names that were added by others, but the "famous actors" section as a whole is badly cited with all the sources added at the end instead of next to the actor's names, and some of the sources aren't available online so it's hard to access which sources were meant for which name. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Civility in edit summaries

You recently left this as an edit summary. "was in the middle of editing how rude! Don't ever do that again!".

First off if you are carrying out an edit and you would like other editors not to edit until you have finished please add this template first {{in use}} to the article as a means of letting other editors know you are editing because there is no other way of knowing who is also editing at any one time.
Secondly please read WP:OWN which will remind you that everyone is free to edit any article (with the exception of protected pages).
Thirdly do not try and tell people what they can and cannot do on wikipedia unless it is in contradiction with guidelines or policy as that is what is really rude IMHO.
Finally if you wish to create a page for a song that is already a redirect then please make sure that when you do so you add sufficient sources to show that it meets WP:NSONG or it will be redirected to another page.

I hope this is helpful for you. happy editing. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

\

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits & expanded citations

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lauren Jauregui, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that would require no review and would not be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Please note that the addition or removal of content, including citations, do not count as minor edits. Thank you.
Also, It would be appreciated if you add full citations as opposed to bare urls to content. See the citation templates that are commonly used (like ones you see in the Lauren Jauregui article). Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Lapadite (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ex on the Beach (U.S. TV series) (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As of right now it still fails WP:GNG. Please add more references that cover the show in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ex on the Beach (U.S. TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ex on the Beach (U.S. TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ex on the Beach (U.S. TV series) has been accepted

Ex on the Beach (U.S. TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 05:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Bracco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Expectations (film) (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Expectations (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:High Expectations (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:High Expectations (film)

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:High Expectations (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:High Expectations (film)

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "High Expectations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Expectations (film) (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two sources are primary, the other two are the same article published on two different websites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Expectations (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:High Expectations (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 00:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Expectations (film) (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit the draft without addressing the issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Expectations (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:High Expectations (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LGBTQ

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LGBTQ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:High Expectations (film)

Hello, Welcometothenewmillenium. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "High Expectations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On High Expectations (film). — Diannaa (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:High Expectations (film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:High Expectations (film). Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]