User talk:Whelanmk

Kingfisher East Bengal Club listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kingfisher East Bengal Club. Since you had some involvement with the Kingfisher East Bengal Club redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Whelanmk (talk) 18:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whelanmk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

learned my lesson now

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you.. Please note that, due to your history of vandalism, we will be looking for very substantial improvements to the article you select. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 18:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What sort of edits would you make if unblocked? Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive edits. I am highly skilled in LaTeX coding and know a bit about tennis. Maybe get a few to GA Whelanmk (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]