User talk:Wikimga

Wikimga, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikimga! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hernando Barragán (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DMySon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hernando Barragán and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hernando Barragán, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DMySon (talk) 01:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hernando Barragán has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hernando Barragán. Thanks! Salimfadhley (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: May-Li Khoe (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing independent sources - everything not one of her patents is an interview or by her employer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:May-Li Khoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:May-Li Khoe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos F. López has been accepted

Carlos F. López, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nearlyevil 665 12:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrés Burbano (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrés Burbano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrés Burbano, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hernando Barragán has been accepted

Hernando Barragán, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:May-Li Khoe has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:May-Li Khoe. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: May-Li Khoe (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:May-Li Khoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:May-Li Khoe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do the current sources not count as reliable and secondary? Among them are: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (considered by Wikipedia “among the top academic institutions in the world”), NPR member station KQED-FM, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Reneé Ritchie from iMore (considered by Wikipedia “one of the 15 most important Apple analysts and writers”), and Figma (a multi-billion-dollar-valued company) just to name a few. Wikimga (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are reliable and secondary however they don't show that the subject qualifies for a WP article. For example the Figma article is about 3 people - it's not a profile of Khoe herself. MurielMary (talk) 00:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. This person is one of the inventors of augmented-reality face filters. Anyone who has taken a selfie with computer-generated overlays on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok or similar applications has been using a derivative of this invention. Would you agree that Snapchat, TikTok, or Instagram are noteworthy creations? Would you agree that millions (if not billions) of augmented-reality face images have been created? This is only giving one example of the contributions to computer science (and society in general) this person has made. Wikimga (talk) 03:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the person might be very notable and very significant, but the criteria for having a biography on Wikipedia include how thoroughly the secondary sources cover the subject. To show notability there need to be articles written solely about the subject - not about the subject in passing, or as one of a group of people. There is a similar comment from another reviewer (S0091) on the draft from November 2021, stating that more significant coverage is needed. MurielMary (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you probably didn't read this then: https://capd.mit.edu/people/may-li-khoe/ Wikimga (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read that. It is a profile written by an institution which employs her, therefore although it is of interest, it's not an objective secondary source. It's very common for academics to have profiles like this on their institution's website. You need to find significant coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources e.g. an interview with her or a profile of her in an independent and reliable source. MurielMary (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

like an interview in Rene Ritchie's podcast? https://www.imore.com/how-design-and-operations-really-work-apple Wikimga (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, a podcast is not a reliable source. I suggest you read the guidelines on reliable sources and what qualifies as one and ask at The Teahouse if you have any further questions. All the best with your wiki editing. MurielMary (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: May-Li Khoe (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bogger was:

Remove external links, replace them with references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:May-Li Khoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:May-Li Khoe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bogger (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks! Wikimga (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrés Burbano

Hello, Wikimga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrés Burbano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: May-Li Khoe (July 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Missvain was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hi.

I'm sorry, but the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines nor WP:NARTIST. I see a few interviews, which can only be used in *very* limited ways in Wikipedia articles because they are primary sources, other primary sources (i.e. patent documents don’t do anything for notability), or non-notable publications or passing mentions.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about May-Li Khoe specifically; books or white papers written ABOUTMay-Li Khoe; television and radio features ABOUT May-Li Khoe. You can find other guidelines at WP:NBIO and also take a look at WP:NARTIST. If her work is held in major collections at museums, that could count towards notability.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for May-Li Khoe to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 15:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:May-Li Khoe

Hello, Wikimga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:May-Li Khoe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]