User talk:WillBo
May 2016
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Voyager program has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Voyager program was changed by WillBo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951448 on 2016-05-20T12:31:25+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, WillBo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, WillBo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Edit-warring on Chlorine dioxide
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Please persist in your work for accuracy!
[edit]Please don't get discouraged too quickly as you work on revisions re. MMS info! There have been a number of incorrect claims regarding citations on the article, & resistance to revision has been strong because there have been strong safety concern statements from the FDA, etc. and no one wants people hurt. However, the information included on the page should be correct, not just intended to deceptively spook people for their own good. I personally am not pro-MMS, but I am pro-accuracy.
I have explanations of some of my contributions on the article's Talk page, right above yours. Here are some earlier valid edits I worked at that encountered some resistance:
I know of a number of substantiated, relevant sources that actually do provide more concrete info & will send some to you soon. I just wanted to send you a note to encourage you in your pursuit of greater accuracy for this page. I will also chip in discussion on the Talk page as needed to help the page be revised where needed. If you'd like, you can send potential revisions for me to look at, too, before posting on the page.
Thank you for working toward ensuring quality, reliable content! We have a responsibility to work with integrity in providing info here on Wikipedia, because our work affects so many around the world! Thank you for your work in this team effort to evaluate how to best inform on important topics!!!
Field In (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Please check your email
[edit]I just sent you a message. Please let me know when you get it. Thanks! Field In (talk) 20:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)