User talk:Wtvg1

This user is banned from editing the English Wikipedia. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking.
(block log · contributions)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to WTVJ. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --Mhking (talk) 04:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to WCVB-TV. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rollosmokes (talk) 05:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

News music in TV station articles

Please refrain from adding news music information from TV station articles. Consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations is to exclude such information as being of interest to such a small subset of readers as to be trivial. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Roland: I've moved the material you placed into an article into your userpage -- found at User:Wtvg1 -- because that's where it belongs; the userpage is the only thing here that can be described as "my Wikipedia page". If you have any questions about Wikipedia policy, you can leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please listen to us and stop adding news music info in articles. I have just reverted your changes at WSFL-TV, and you will be reported should you continue to make such edits. Rollosmokes (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my fake broadcasting company with my fake TV stations? Wtvg1 (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newscast titles discussion

I have opened a discussion on newscast titles in TV station articles. You are invited to participate. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please refrain from adding newscast titles to station articles. Much of the information you are adding is unsourced and speculative, and adds nothing but fancruft to the articles. You have also not taken Dhett's invite to discuss this with the group. Until you do so, all additions such as this will be deleted. Rollosmokes (talk) 15:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dhett, how do I particapte for the TV Station Articles? Wtvg1 (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For one, you have to follow the rules and standards of the project, which, apparently, you're disobeying. -- azumanga (talk) 23:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the rules? Wtvg1 (talk) 23:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold

If you see something that needs to be changed in an article, go ahead and change it! There's no need to ask permission. Perhaps you're gunshy from the newscast titles and music dustup - your changes need to be reliably sourced and encyclopedic. If something you do goes against previous project consensus, we'll let you know, and then you just don't do it anymore. When I first started, I made sorting changes to scores of categories, thinking I was doing good. Come to find out, the project had already decided against doing what I had done. Someone informed me, so I reverted my changes. It took awhile, but I eventually undid all of my previous work. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WBRE-TV

I tried to change the station history of WBRE-TV, because it's supposed to be Wilkes-BarR E & i tried to do that & it wouldn't work. Can you guys fix that? Roland Ortega (talk) 23:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KENS-TV

I have reverted your changes to KENS-TV. It is not appropriate to use symbols such as "&" and "@" to replace the words "and" and "at", nor is it appropriate to use abbreviations such as "1st" or "3rd" to replace the words "first" and "third". Please consult the Manual of Style for more information. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

I have reverted most of your edits from 13:05 on August 1 to 15:54 on August 2. Replacing "and" with "&" or replacing "at" with "@", especially in mid-sentence, is very poor grammar and goes against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Please stop making edits like this, as you have been warned above. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 23:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to KLAS-TV, you will be blocked from editing. -- azumanga (talk) 20:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

Dude, you have been asked multiple times not to change "and" to "&", not to change "at" to "@", not to change "11:00" to "11", and not to change "p.m." to "PM". Also, changing "its" to "it's", when it doesn't mean "it is", is wrong. You can have a sentence read "it's newscast is @ 6 & 11PM". That is a mess some people can't understand and against Wikipedia's Manual of Style, which is how we write articles.

Now, you have been asked above by a couple admin to stop. They have the power to block you from editing if you continue. I ask that you take a look at WP:RS and WP:MOS as asked by those admin and let us know if you have any questions. Next step is a block...not fun...trust me! - NeutralHomer ^talk|edits 05:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to KLAS-TV, you will be blocked from editing. -- azumanga (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You have been banned from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's banning policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. Tan ǀ 39 22:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why were you banned from Wikipedia? I think you should return. MikeM2010 (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because he was a bad editor and made stupid edits? StephenWeinstein (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wtvg1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unbanned because this time, I will add any info for any of the articles into wikipedia

Decline reason:

You've abused multiple accounts and vandalized frequently. Why should we believe you've changed now? — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.