User talk:Wywuwuwu

August 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Miss Universe Nepal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Miss Universe Nepal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Miss Kazakhstan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm very sorry for the inconvenience, I was editing the page and fixing grammatical errors but my computer suddenly lagged and resulted in the weird removal of the content. I'm very sorry! Thank you. Wywuwuwu (talk) 13:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 5 2023

Hi! I noticed you added Bulgaria in the contestants section, well according to this announcement, this was NOT annoucned by the MUO (Miss Universe Organization) or it's national selection. So next time if you want to add a contestant, make sure it's should be official, not sharing any fake information, thank you. Hitsme (talk) 11:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariana Downing (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mariana Downing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wywuwuwu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariana Downing (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mariana Downing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss Universe Pakistan, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:BOLD Sciencefish (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss Universe Bahamas, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding bold to article. Please read MOS:BOLD Sciencefish (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Miss USA. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop adding bold to articles per MOS:BOLD Sciencefish (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiii! Can you please explain why writing the Placements of the Contestant is considered inappropriate? In all other articles, the placements of the Delegates are bolded. Wywuwuwu (talk) 14:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Placements of the Contestant does not follow Wikipedia's manual of style (MOS) for Bold. Please read MOS:BOLD. Note that for emphasis italics are use in Wikipedia. Other articles that are using bold for emphasis will eventually be changed as well. Articles not following the MOS should be changed. Sadly the majority of beauty pageant related pages do not follow the MOS in regard to bold, the use of flags, and the use of line breaks for formatting (these interfere with screen readers and so some users have difficulty accessing the encylopedia) Sciencefish (talk) 14:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss Grand International 2015, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't add flags to infoboxes per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG Sciencefish (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Miss Universe 2024, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 10:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Miss Universe 2020. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop adding flags to infoboxes per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and bold to articles per MOS:BOLD Sciencefish (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss Universe 2020. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sciencefish (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss Universe 2021. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sciencefish (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Miss Universe Bahamas, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop adding Bold to articles Sciencefish (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 1978, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret Gardiner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Miss USA 2021. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop adding flags to infoboxes per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG Sciencefish (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Miss Universe 2019, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop adding flags to infoboxes per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG Sciencefish (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Miss Universe 2019. You are continuing to revert the infobox edits against MOS:BOLD, MOS:INFOBOXFLAG, WP:ACCESSIBILITY, MOS:NOBREAKS, MOS:SMALLFONT. If you revert one more time you will be in breach of the The three-revert rule WP:3RR. If you disagree with the Manual of style, please take your reasons to the article talk page and discuss there: Talk:Miss Universe 2019. Sciencefish (talk) 13:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Miss Universe 2002. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mariana Downing

Hello, Wywuwuwu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mariana Downing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mariana Downing

Hello, Wywuwuwu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mariana Downing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]