User talk:Ysgravin

July 2011

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, several of your recent edits to the article on Dan Roodt did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Johannes Jaar (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Roodt

Your recent edits to Dan Roodt have been reverted as unencyclopedic. None of the material added was supported by a citation. The tone of the language was innapropriate for an encyclopedia. The neutrality of the material was doubtful. You are welcome to discuss the material you would like to add to the article on the article's discussion page, please do so before editing the articla again. Thanks Roger (talk) 11:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your refusal to co-operate or to take advice offered in edit summaries as well as here is becoming a problem. I am sorry but I am no longer able to work on this article in good faith if you are going to simply revert all the improvements I am making. Just one example: you are repeatedly inserting inline external links. When I change them to wikilinks that go to the correct Wikipedia articles you simply change them back. Your failure to use edit summaries is also making it very difficult to understand your actions. Once again I am extending an invitation to you to discuss your edits on the article's talk page. Please communicate with other editors such as myself so that we can improve the article co-operatively. Thanks Roger (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo there. Due to the unverified nature of the major changes you have recently been implementing to the article Dan Roodt, it has been agreed to roll back the article somewhat to constructively take this foward. I understand that you have issues with the neutrality of the article. Please see the article's talk page, where a discussion of disputed matters can be put forward before any rash edits are undertaken - especially ones that site no verifiable and reliable sources. I hope that we can amicably come to an agreement to improve the article, which I believe could very much do with expansion (with relevant and sourced encyclopedic information). Please keep in mind that this is an encyclopedic article on the subject, and not a comprehensive biography. Johannes Jaar (talk) 09:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]