User talk:Yunipo

Welcome!

Hello, Yunipo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Brilliant! [1] - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond, BC schools

User:Phoenix Hacker has put the {{prod}} template on just about all (if not all) the schools listed in {{RichmondBCSchools}}. You might want to fix up the articles or something so you don't lose them all. Just letting you know. ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 15:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

School Stub Creation, please improve

Please, take the time to make at least decent stubs out of all these school articles you are creating. One line entries saying "X is a Y school in Z" plus a template for all schools in Z is just a useless article. And for goodness sakes, don't use {{stub}} to mark them, take the time to do your own stub-sorting. That template is supposed to be used only when you have no clue what template should be used. Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types#Education gives you a list of school stub templates that you could use; Australia, Canada, Europe, India, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and every individual U.S. state. Wikipedia:Stub tells us that a stub needs to be long enough to be useful and says generally "which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences". If you write one decent stub, that is far more useful to us than 10 of these sub-stubs that need other people to come along and generate content. Additionally, adding material about why anyone outside the local region would care that the school exists will cut off deletion discussions before they begin. GRBerry 03:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Just a friendly reminder: Articles for deletion is not a vote - it is a discussion. Please give reasons for keeping or deleting articles. Thanks. :) --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

river stubs

hi yunipo - just a quick note to say that if youre making any more river stubs, every US state has its own geo-stub so you can use oklahoma-geo-stub :) BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 02:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but for crying out loud, stop with the single sentences. You are wasting everyone's time with these, including your own. 71.102.76.166 06:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have an account. I choose not to use it. On occasion, I pop on by to see what's going on. What you're doing is simply creating a lot of extra work. A good article should be at least 8-10 sentences long. BTW, my comment was not meant to be offensive. 71.102.76.166 07:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

If you vandalize wigger again, you'll be blocked from editing.--Bonafide.hustla 06:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To those reading my talk page, I did not vandalize Wikipedia. Please read my reply [2] to this message.

--Yunipo 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit war

Please stop reinserting the word negro in Wigger. As you can see from the article history, it's not only bonafide.hustla who considers it vandalism, User:Rlitwin does too. For my part I'm assuming that it was a good-faith edit, but you should listen to other people round here and be willing to compromise. Edit warring is frowned on. Don't revert again. Negro is generally considered offensive, and there is no need for it in the article (unlike the word nigger which is needed to explain the parts of which the word wigger is constructed. Bishonen | talk 12:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Stop wikilayering

Please stop wikilawyering. Negro is a very, very insulting and derogatory terminology and everybody knows that. It's universal. Use it again then you'll be blocked.--Bonafide.hustla 07:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonafide.hustla is obviously a troll. Please read my reply [3].

--Yunipo 16:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Stop harassing bonafide.hustla. According to your contributions list, you have written to and of him nine times since he last wrote to you, which was this morning (UTC time): addressing him on his page, on your page, complaining to an admin that hes harassing you (which I find ironic) and removing a fair-use image from his userpage. (The last would be an appropriate action if performed against someone you weren't stalking; now, not so much.) This is inappropriate behavior. Besides, on the matter of fact, he has support for what he says about the usage of negro; other people have been agreeing with him; I haven't yet seen anybody agree with you. Just stop obsessing about it please. Especially, don't resort to personal attacks. You have now called bonafide.hustla "troll" three times. He's not a troll, and if I were you, I would apologize. At any rate, stop going on at him or you will receive a cautionary block. And yes, I am an administrator. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 16:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Whatever I'm leaving this shit hole. Wikipedia is filled with biased neo-conservatives who don't even follow their own policies. Administrators break the rules, and when confronted they come up with stupid excuses like "Wikilawyering".

--Yunipo 18:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Adolf Hitler, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup 03:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for your mass vandalism of articles by inserting bonafide.hustla's joke banner in them. That should be enough time to calm down and figure out if you're interested in having a future in "this shithole" or not. Bishonen | talk 04:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Little context in Little River (Alabama)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Little River (Alabama), by Benon (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Little River (Alabama) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Little River (Alabama), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Little River (Alabama) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo stjohns.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo stjohns.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bear Creek (Alabama)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bear Creek (Alabama), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, no independent references. Also, there are 15 different Bear Creeks in Alabama alone.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Altairisfar _talk 00:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alexconvo.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Alexconvo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mercurial Communications

The article Mercurial Communications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Bennetta Slaughter

An article that you have been involved in editing—Bennetta Slaughter—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Matuko (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]