User talk:Zee2019

Welcome!

Hello, Zeeyarah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was User:Zeeyarah/sandbox, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zeeyarah, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zeeyarah! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Zeeyarah/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Zeeyarah/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Masum Reza^📞 13:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

notability for businesses

Please see WP:CORP. Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can rename you if you ping me by placing {{ping|dlohcierekim}} in your request and sign with 4 ~'s Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zee2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new on wikipedia and before my user name was a name of Company or Organization that's why i got blocked. now i have changed my user name. kindly please unblock me so that i can write my an artical.

Accept reason:

renamed-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello Zee2019. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zee2019. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zee2019|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Hug^syrup 10:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hugsyrup,

Disclosure- I am working with Superior Tracks Travel and Tourism IT department, please advise way forward if any further action needed. This reply was posted at my talk page, but I have moved it here so other editors who may visit the page can see that Zee2019 has responded, and can follow up with them direct if needed Hug^syrup 11:16, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zee2019: thank you for the reply. I am not sure of the relationship between Superior Tracks and Zeeyarah, so can you please just confirm if you are receiving any payment to edit here at Wikipedia, if you are doing it as part of your job, or if you have been asked to do it by someone you work with, a colleague, client etc. Thanks! Hug^syrup 11:16, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Strike all that, I see that Superior Tracks Travel and Tourism is the parent company. So in that case, you need to please place the template mentioned above {{paid|user=Zee2019|employer=Superior Tracks Travel and Tourism}} on your userpage. You should also read the policy on paid editing and not make any direct edits to Zeeyarah, only suggest edits on the talk page for other editors to implement. Hug^syrup 11:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugsyrup: Thank you For your advise. I am doing this as a part of my job. i have placed the template {{paid|user=Zee2019|employer=Superior Tracks Travel and Tourism}} on my user page. you can please check it and educate me so that i can make it more better. Thank you.

@Zee2019: nice one, thanks. I think actually you should also add this: |client=Zeeyarah within the tag just before the closing }}. My bad for not including that before, but it would probably count as the 'client' in this case. Otherwise, looks good. Please also read WP:COI and especially this section about how to edit articles, and guidelines for what to do/not to do. Hug^syrup 11:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugsyrup: Thank you For your advice. Finally would like to hear from you if I must do anything further or leave the article at your discretion hoping it will be re-consider for publishing. As I already mention the intention is to provide information with reliable and independently verifiable reference and not to promote or advertise. Again thanking you for your support and patience.

@Zee2019: if you want the article to be kept, you will need to find several reliable, independent secondary sources that talk about Zeeyarah in some detail (not just passing mentions). The kind of thing we'd be thinking of would be articles about it in a major newspaper or magazine, coverage in books, etc. I wasn't able to find any such coverage which is why I argued for deletion at the discussion, and I think it is unlikely that any exist. However, you may be able to find ones that I couldn't. Hug^syrup 13:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugsyrup: Thank you for Your support I really appreciate it. As you mentioned here I am putting reliable and independent secondary sources that talk about Zeeyarah. And i am also putting the link for full post. https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/companies/story/Zeeyarahcom_gets_highest_level_of_IATA_NDC_Certification_for_sellers-ZAWYA20190718112756/^[1]

“By achieving Level 4 NDC certification as a seller, Zeeyarah joins other industry leaders supporting efforts to enable full, rich content and product differentiation in the travel agent channel, while supporting servicing functionalities” said Yanik Hoyles, Director Industry Distribution Programs, IATA.

Nomination of Zeeyarah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeeyarah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeeyarah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willbb234 (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeeyarah (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zeeyarah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zeeyarah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zeeyarah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zeeyarah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zeeyarah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zeeyarah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hug^syrup 07:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UnBlock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zee2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not trying to advertise any company i m just writing an article related to the company. Can you please unblock me so that i can write with different data which will be different and will not look like advertisement. i will be very thankful to you if you will unblock me.

Decline reason:

It is very clear that your only purpose here is to shoehorn an article about your client into Wikipedia. We aren't going to allow you to do that. If you want to be unblocked, you're going to need to let us know what you plan on doing here instead, otherwise there is no reason for us to unblock you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:32, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UnBlock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zee2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason I understand your objection to block me but i am new on Wikipedia and i am understating the terms of Wikipedia one by one and from now i will take care of the terms and conditions before editing an article. And i will not do something which will be against the terms and conditions of Wikipedia. Please unblock me this time I can assure you that there will be nothing like that again. Thank You.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UnBlock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zee2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already told you that I understand the reason for what you have blocked me, and i also ensure you that I will not continue to cause any damage or disruption and I will try my best to make useful contribution in Wikipedia article. I will be very thankful to you if you understand me and unblock me. Thank you

Decline reason:

Experience tells us that editors who claim they understand the reason for being blocked really don't. Therefore, please explain in your own words why repeatedly inserting promotional content about your client is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and the edits you will make if unblocked. MER-C 19:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

^ "reliable and independent secondary sources that talk about Zeeyarah"

[1] "reliable and independent secondary sources that talk about Zeeyarah"

[1]