User talk:Zingbit22

Welcome!

Hello, Zingbit22, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zingbit22, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Zingbit22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC 10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible (August 25)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Libby norman (talk) 17:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Forza Industries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ashford

Jan Stanek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Channel 5

Poly Implant Prothèse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NHS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Expert opinion

Hi Zingbit, welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have added information on expert opinion to some articles. Please note that Wikipedia does not include information from this type of source. For more information on what sources to use, please see WP:RS and WP:MEDRS. Wikipedia can have a bit of a learning curve, but I hope you stick with it.--Taylornate (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice on this subject Taylornate. I'm following up on an area of personal interest but presumed I was following the proper reference protocol by ensuring that every statement was fully supported - as I would do for a post-graduate paper. Trying to ensure that what I'm adding is suitable for the generalist/mainstream reader rather than assuming specialist (ie medical) knowledge so it's good of you to keep me right. Much appreciated.
— User:Zingbit22

After looking at some of your other edits, I am wondering if you may have some connection with Jan Stanek. In order to keep Wikipedia neutral, it has a policy on conflict of interest. I would encourage you to read this policy and consider your motivation for making some of your edits. People often come to Wikipedia to promote their own interests. Usually this is not a willful disregard for the rules, but a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is about. Aside from this type of editing being against the rules, an unintended consequence can be unwanted scrutiny, sometimes resulting in unflattering information being added about the topic.--Taylornate (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC 10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible (September 3)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zingbit22, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 Years Younger: Cosmetic Surgery Bible, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a rejected submission at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]