Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AstaBOTh15
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Manuelt15 (talk · contribs)
Automatic or Manually assisted: automatic
Programming language(s): python (pywikipedia)
Source code available: standart pywikipeda interwiki.py and featured.py
Function overview: interwiki, adding {{Link FA}} template
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Periodically
Estimated number of pages affected:
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function details: Maintain interwiki in mainspace and Category: namespace. Adding {{Link FA}} template. Already botflag on es, an, ca, eu, fr, it, pt, gl, eswikiquote, eswiktionary but only deals with featured templates in es, eu, pt, fr, an.
Discussion
[edit]The interewiki linking is obviously fairly uncontroversial here. I see you have plenty of experience on other wikis, but please confirm that you will not be adding interwiki links to pages in the template namespace, and understand our bot policy, in particular Wikipedia:Bot_policy#Interwiki_links. As to the Link FA, this has been approved for a couple of bots before, and again seems fairly uncontroversial. Also, would it be possible to change the edit rate from 1/6sec to one edit every 10 seconds? It's nitpicky, but hey! - Kingpin13 (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, 6 edits per min :) And yes, I have read and understand the bot policy, and as I wrote previously, I'm going to work only with articles and categories. Best regards --by Màñü飆¹5 (m†¹5™) 10:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh right, did spot that namespace notice but forgot *sheepish grin*. Okay, may as well do a small trial, more for the Link FA than the interwiki, since we rarely bother with trialling the latter. Approved for trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete.--by Màñü飆¹5 (m†¹5™) 02:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh right, did spot that namespace notice but forgot *sheepish grin*. Okay, may as well do a small trial, more for the Link FA than the interwiki, since we rarely bother with trialling the latter. Approved for trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Kingpin? Josh Parris 06:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Yep, I'm not kingpin but I'm going to approve this. Tim1357 (talk) 23:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.