Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 14

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

BattyBot 14

Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 17:09, Sunday December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Change {{Cleanup}} to {{Cleanup-book}}. The more specific template will hopefully encourage interested editors to cleanup the articles, and eventually remove the maintenance template altogether.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): One time run, then smaller runs as needed.

Estimated number of pages affected: 300

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Similar to BattyBot 11 and BattyBot 12, use AWB's find & replace functionality to do the following:

For all articles with {{Infobox book}} or {{Infobox book series}}, change {{Cleanup}} to {{Cleanup-book}}.
Change either the template (e.g. this edit) or the parameter in {{Multiple issues}} (e.g. this edit)
Any AWB general fixes will be made at the same time.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz ^talk 21:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. GoingBatty (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-BAG member note: [1] looks a bit funny... --j⚛e decker ^talk 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks funny syntactically, but to the reader it would appear correct right? GoingBatty, can AWB convert {{multiple issues}} into the new format as a gen fix? Legoktm (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure, it looked right to me on the page. (And if it does appear correctly on the page, I have no complaints, I just wasn't sure I wasn't missing something.)--j⚛e decker ^talk 00:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, AWB general fixes do not convert existing {{Multiple issues}} parameters from the old format to the new format. GoingBatty (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. MBisanz ^talk 16:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.