Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:06, Sunday March 30, 2014 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Fix incorrect wikilinks in citation templates
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Occasional runs
Estimated number of pages affected: hundreds
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Fix incorrect wikilinks in the work/journal/magazine/newspaper/publisher parameters of citation templates. For example:
[[Billboard]]→[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]](e.g. this diff)[[Blender]]→[[Blender (magazine)|Blender]][[Esquire]]→[[Esquire (magazine)|Esquire]]
Discussion
[edit]- I'm sure GB knows this, and only gave the above three examples, but a more comprehensive list (not exhaustive) can be found at User:Ohconfucius/test/Sources_subscript3.js, even better list here. -- Ohc ¡digame! 08:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Wow - that's a ton - thanks! Three more: Liberty, Parent, Q. GoingBatty (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, that's only for completeness' sake. You might not want to weigh down your regexes too much. I think that in practice, the operational list can be a lot smaller because the vast majority of these will never be cited. I wonder what criteria we can use to filter the less important... -- Ohc ¡digame! 03:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Since DPL bot lets users know when they add ambiguous wikilinks such as Mojo or Wired, I'm going to start with a small list of wikilinks that go to articles unrelated to the magazines: Billboard, Blender, Ebony, Empire, Essence, Esquire, Gourmet, Interview, Liberty, Life, Money, Ms., Musician, National Geographic, Parade, Parent, Parents, Parenting, People, Premiere, Q, Scouting, Self, Slate, Smithsonian, Star, Stern, Sunset, Tennis, Time, and Women's Health. GoingBatty (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, that's only for completeness' sake. You might not want to weigh down your regexes too much. I think that in practice, the operational list can be a lot smaller because the vast majority of these will never be cited. I wonder what criteria we can use to filter the less important... -- Ohc ¡digame! 03:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Wow - that's a ton - thanks! Three more: Liberty, Parent, Q. GoingBatty (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --slakr\ talk / 07:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Trial complete. - see these diffs. GoingBatty (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
A user has requested the attention of a member of the Bot Approvals Group. Once assistance has been rendered, please deactivate this tag by replacing it with {{t|BAG assistance needed}}. GoingBatty (talk) 14:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Approved. MBisanz talk 05:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.
