Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DarafshBot 4
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 10:09, Wednesday October 10, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Standard pywikipedia
Function overview: add interwiki in Template namespace (ns:10)
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DarafshBot 3
Edit period(s): Continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: perhaps 200 per day
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes
Function details: add or edit interwikis in Template namespace (ns:10) with autonomous parameter.
Discussion
[edit]Thanks Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you explain the six edits to templates that your bot made today (shortly after you filed this request), despite your earlier statement that the bot would only run in the main namespace? Also, is your bot running as part of the "interwikibot" multi-maintainer project (rather than under your own account) as required by current Toolserver rules? PleaseStand (talk) 23:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 6 edits was for test. i have toolserver account but dont run Interwiki on this, i run it on personal server. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 05:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- im waiting.... Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 09:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. Please make sure you update your personal server as the Interwiki software is updated. MBisanz talk 16:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. MBisanz talk 17:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.