Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/H92Bot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

H92Bot

Operator: — H92 (t · c · no)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Semi (run in terminal on my Mac with -autonomous argument)

Programming Language(s): Python.

Function Summary: Add interwiki to new pages.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Several hours several times a week.

Edit rate requested: N/A: depends on new article creation rate.

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: python interwiki.py -autonomous -new ← that should say it all ;)

Discussion

Umm … should I make some test edits? — H92 (t · c · no) 23:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. Do you already run the bot elsewhere? Are you a sysop elsewhere? — Werdna talk 23:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I run the bot on nowiki and nnwiki already, and it works fine (because of low article creation rate and almost only experienced writers at nnwiki I haven’t got the chance to try it out there, but on nowiki it works). I’m a sysop on nowikibooks, and I am a patroller (that is, with patrol rights) on nowiki. — H92 (t · c · no) 23:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On enwiki, we require that you update your pywikipedia installation on a regular basis (usually, just before you go ahead with a run). Is this okay with you? — Werdna talk 23:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ehh … well, does that mean all files or just the interwiki.py file? I actually don‘t know how I can get SVN on a Mac, but I sure can copy-paste from http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/? — H92 (t · c · no) 23:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wait, I found it here. I guess this won‘t be a problem. — H92 (t · c · no) 23:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Everything seems to be in order. Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. one full interwiki run. You may make test edits, now. — Werdna talk 23:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. — H92 (t · c · no) 23:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm … I‘d rather wait a little until I get that SVN thing sorted out, but as you can see from the one contrib that it‘s working. ;) — H92 (t · c · no) 23:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SVN now updated, running now (unfortunately it can’t do anything when there are no interwiki links at all in the new articles… — H92 (t · c · no) 00:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

217 edits are now made, I have been watching during the whole run and the edits seem OK to me. As it sometimes makes several edits a minute, I’m now awaiting bot flag before further running, to keep RecentChanges clean from my bot’s edits. Thanks in advance! ;) — H92 (t · c · no) 11:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹoɟ ʇs(st47) 16:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.