Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MilHistBot 7
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 03:16, Thursday, September 24, 2020 (UTC)
Function overview: This job runs through the backlog of MilHist project articles without task forces assigned, and adds appropriate task force cards to the MilHist project template on the talk page.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): C#
Source code available: User:MilHistBot/AutoClass.cs
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#The final frontier
Edit period(s): weekly
Estimated number of pages affected: Initially, a backlog of about 900 articles. Thereafter about 30 articles per week.
Namespace(s): Talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: The job loops through the Category:Military history articles with no associated task force and examines the articles found there. The categories are matched against a list of keywords, and the task force cards are added to the Template:WikiProject Military history template.
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- * This has been delayed due to changes to the software for another job. Hope to get it run soon. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC
- Trial complete. No significant problems. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hawkeye7, link to diffs please? Primefac (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a discussion in progress. Will provide another set. Diffs look like this. Nothing harmful. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hawkeye7: Could you please link the discussion? --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a discussion in progress. Will provide another set. Diffs look like this. Nothing harmful. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hawkeye7, link to diffs please? Primefac (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. No significant problems. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Primefac: I don’t really see enough getting in the way of this approval and it appears most issues raised were either non-issues or resolved. Hawkeye is quite receptive to catching edge cases, which I think is good enough to proceed. --TheSandDoctor Talk 03:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Primefac (talk) 22:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.