Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/VP-bot 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Operator: Vpovilaitis (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 05:50, Wednesday November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised and Automatic supervised
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Standard pywikipedia
Function overview: interwiki
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): one time run
Estimated number of pages affected: 50/day
Exclusion compliant (Y/N):
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): lt, de, eo, fr, pl, pt, ru see
Function details: Interwiki --Vpovilaitis (talk) 05:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]- Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What parameters will you be running this with? - Kingpin13 (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm using "interwiki.py -autonomous" from lt wiki. --Vpovilaitis (talk) 06:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What parameters will you be running this with? - Kingpin13 (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"one time run"? Are you sure? Will this bot not be running continuously (or daily/weekly)? --Chris 09:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also note, I've temporarily blocked the bot for editing without approval. --Chris 09:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note that I asked the operator to make a BRFA ([1], User_talk:VP-bot#Bot_flag), as the bot has been editing quite a while since last expired BRFA (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/VP-bot). — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm use VP-bot for the interwiki updates only in the very exclusive situations when the other bot's from Lithuanian wikipedia can't work and don't work for that. So my bot are not very activ for that. --Vpovilaitis (talk) 09:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedily Approved. --Chris 06:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.