Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WikiCleanerBot 10

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

WikiCleanerBot 10

Operator: NicoV (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 09:35, Wednesday, July 10, 2019 (UTC)

Function overview: Fix some errors reported by Special:LintErrors/misnested-tag

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Java (WPCleaner)

Source code available: On GitHub (especially algorithm 539)

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Several edit sessions to go through the existing list once, then once or twice a month at most.

Estimated number of pages affected: On the ~7000 pages currently in Special:LintErrors/misnested-tag, a dry run results in about 250 pages modified.

Namespace(s): Main

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Fix some cases of misnested tags as reported by Special:LintErrors/misnested-tag. The idea is to fix cases where there's no doubt about the solution. For example, on 101 Ways to Leave a Gameshow, it will replace ''心跳阿根廷 Xin Tiao A Gen Ting'' by ''心跳阿根廷 Xin Tiao A Gen Ting'' (correct nesting of italic and small).

Discussion

{{BAG assistance needed}} Any objection on running a few test edits? --NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 11:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. NicoV, please post a permanent link of the bot's contributions page which shows the edits. If you have any questions, please do ask away. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. Thanks TheSandDoctor. I've done the 50 edits, no problems detected. --NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 21:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Under normal circumstances, I would prefer to leave the close for someone else. However, given the backlog, lack of recent BAG activity (myself included), and the fact that this task is uncontroversial and based on how well the trial went, I am inclined to make an exception for this. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.