Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/rezabot
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Reza1615 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 02:54, Monday April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: pywikipedia
Function overview: Interwiki
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): everyday
Estimated number of pages affected:
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function details:
Discussion
[edit]Note: I believe this is a request for an interwiki linker; user recently requested that such a bot be made. I note this just because the user left out function details. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 03:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The "operator" field must be your English wikipedia user account (User:Reza1615), where users can contact you or go to Fa wiki page. Please use this account for any edits or replies, not the bot account (WP:BOTPOL: "bot operators should not use a bot account to respond to messages related to the bot.") Secondly, what interwiki.py options are you using? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- usually I use interwiki.py -auto -async -quiet -family:wikipedia -lang:fa command but because I haven't flag in English wiki I didn't set it to add interwiki to another wikis so many of my robotic articles doesn't have two sided interwiki they only have another wiki's links in fa wiki but other wikis don't have fa wiki links.in these days i use this command interwiki.py -autonomous -file:ArticleNameList.txt it works but in one side!(for example fa:بخش اپانزل)Reza1615 (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedily Approved. Usual pywiki, runs fine on fa. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 07:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.