Wikipedia:Featured article review/Autostereogram/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 13:21, 12 January 2013 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]Autostereogram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Hyacinth, Psychology WikiProject
This is a 2006 FA. I am nominating it for review because it has multiple tags, walls of uncited text, and there has been no response to talk page queries dating back more than a year. Fred Hsu (talk · contribs) has not been active since 2009. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Burn it per criterion 1a, 1c, and 3: many one sentence paragraphs, tons of uncited text, and there are way too many images. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, move to FARC, etc. per above. Multiple criterion — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Delist are not declared in the FAR phase; Featured article review (FAR) is for determining if an article needs to move to the Feature Article Removal Candidate (FARC) phase, where Keep or Delist are declared. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As a drive-by comment, the number of images seems excessive, even allowing for the topic of this article. A smaller number of well chosen images would be much superior to the current over supply (which also gives the article a rather 'cluttered' feel). The large chunks of unreferenced text also pretty much automatically rule this out as a FA. I agree that this should go to a FARC. Nick-D (talk) 07:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Concerns raised in the review section include prose, sourcing, and images. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress, no one working on it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, move to FARC, etc. per above. Multiple criterion — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per SandyGeorgia (talk · contribs). JJ98 (Talk) 18:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, major issues. Sasata (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.